Lens review
Nikon Nikkor AF-S DX 16-85 mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR
11. Summary
Pros:
- good build quality,
- useful range of focal lengths,
- very good frame centre image quality at all focal lengths and aperture combinations
- good frame edge image quality (apart from the maximum aperture),
- low chromatic aberration in the middle of the focal lengths range,
- slight astigmatism,
- quick, accurate and silent autofocus
Cons:
- frame edge image quality should have been better at maximum aperture,
- too high chromatic aberration at the extremes of the focal lengths range,
- high distortion at the widest angle,
- visible coma,
- high vignetting,
- average work against bright light.
How could you sum up our test? It is not easy at all as our feelings are mixed. On the one hand the lens’s focal lengths range is very universal, giving us a wide angle of view. On the other hand, though, the lens is not fast enough. The competitors, like the Zeiss 16-80 mm and the Olympus 12-60 mm, although more expensive, have also significantly more to offer. Nikkor gives us stabilization but Sony and Olympus have the stabilization system in –built in bodies – what’s more, in the case of Olympus it is almost as efficient as in the Nikkor.
On the one hand the Nikkor’s 16-85 VR advantages are numerous, and the most significant of them is high image quality, possible to achieve for most of usages. On the other hand, though, you could expect less slip-ups from a lens with averagely demanding parameters which costs more than 600 $.
Personally I would prefer having an instrument with a bit shorter focal lengths range , for example 16-70 mm, but faster. I don’t mean f/2.8 here because the price and the dimensions would skyrocket for sure then, but f/4.0 fixed or f/3.5 – f/4.5 variable would do.
Sample shots:


















