Lens review
Nikon Nikkor AF-S 70-300 mm f/4.5-5.6G IF-ED VR
11. Summary
Pros:
- solid barrel,
- very good image sharpness in the frame centre,
- good image quality at the frame edge,
- low distortion,
- slight coma,
- well-corrected astigmatism,
- low vignetting,
- efficient stabilization,
- excellent autofocus.
Cons:
- high or very high chromatic aberration at all focal lengths,
- at 300 mm image resolution could have been better.
To put it in a nutshell Nikon took up to the challenge of the Canon 70-300 IS in a stylish and efficient way. Both lenses have similar properties with the similar pros and cons list and one serious slip-up – in the case of the Canon it was the autofocus, which, for an USM mechanism works badly; in the case of the Nikon it was the chromatic aberration, which level was too high.
What’s more important, in the case of both instruments the 70-300 mm class lenses users can be encouraged to change their devices into the stabilized ones with confidence. Paying those additional 250 $ you get not only the stabilization but also better optical properties and a more efficient autofocus. Of course encouraging is one thing but following our advice is quite another – after all the sum of 250 $ is not a trifle so everybody must consider such a move individually.
Sample shots:












