Lenses
There are 930 lenses in our database and 489 owners opinions.
You can also
compare lenses side-by-side
Konica Minolta AF 17-35 mm f/2.8-4 (D)
Specifications:
| Manufacturer | Konica Minolta |
|---|---|
| Model | AF 17-35 mm f/2.8-4 (D) |
| Lens style | Wide angle zoom |
| Focal length | 17 - 35 mm |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8 - 4 |
| Angle of view | 103.6 - 63.4 o |
| Closest focusing distance | 0.3 m |
| Maximum magnification | 1:5.4 |
| Minimum aperture | 32 |
| Number of diaphragm blades | 7 |
| Auto focus type | AF |
| Lens Construction | 14 elements / 11 groups |
| Filter diameter | 77 mm |
| Macro | No |
| Available mounts | KM/Sony |
| Dimensions | 88.5 x 83 mm |
| Weight | 430 g |
| Additional information |
Average rating (2 owners reviews).
| Build quality | 5.00 |  |
|---|---|---|
| Optical quality | 4.50 |  |
| Value for money | 4.50 | |
| Overall | 4.67 | |
| Build quality |  |
|---|---|
| Optical quality | |
| Value for money | |
| Overall | |
Owner since: 1 year
Price: 275 $
User profile: Professional
Cons: + sharp (f5.6-7.1) + very sharp (f7,1-11) + best colours + nice range zoom + bokeh + AF quickly + good construction + very good for indoor photos
Pros: - light soft (2.8 - 3.2) - flare ... flare ...flare - little things that doesn't affects performance
Summary: I use this lens for 1 year.I'm impressed by sharpness(very good stoped down),colours(!!!!!!),built,quick focus and image quallity.Corners aren't at my expectations,but I close 1-2-3 stops and it's ok.Compatible with sony alpha 850 & 900 represents an advantage. I have to make a hard decission about what lens to buy a year ago: sigma 17-70 f2.8-4.5 or tamron 17-50 f2.8(recomended by the most of the users)....finnaly,my decision was konica-minolta 17-35 f2.8-4 and I am happy for my choice.Ilike tris lens on my alpha 700.I recommend you 100 % konica minolta 17-35 f2.8-4D !!!! cheap and good !!! Some samples : http://picasaweb.google.com/catalindumitrescu23/FotografiiFotografiiFotografii#5355239977674901986 http://picasaweb.google.com/catalindumitrescu23/FotografiiFotografiiFotografii#5392851810793978290 http://picasaweb.google.com/catalindumitrescu23/FotografiiFotografiiFotografii#5355309484185202098 http://picasaweb.google.com/catalindumitrescu23/FotografiiFotografiiFotografii#5392854024708115906 http://picasaweb.google.com/catalindumitrescu23/FotografiiFotografiiFotografii#5392854951341736210 http://picasaweb.google.com/catalindumitrescu23/FotografiiFotografiiFotografii#5392850549420641266 http://picasaweb.google.com/catalindumitrescu23/FotografiiFotografiiFotografii#5355763614238877330 http://picasaweb.google.com/catalindumitrescu23/FotografiiFotografiiFotografii#5355763545281086978 http://picasaweb.google.com/catalindumitrescu23/FotografiiFotografiiFotografii#5355763417085528754 http://picasaweb.google.com/catalindumitrescu23/FotografiiFotografiiFotografii#5355763341672613730 http://picasaweb.google.com/catalindumitrescu23/FotografiiFotografiiFotografii#5355240224928692898 http://picasaweb.google.com/catalindumitrescu23/FotografiiFotografiiFotografii#5355240078596337266
| Build quality | |
|---|---|
| Optical quality |  |
| Value for money | |
| Overall | |
Owner since: 6 months
Price: 190€
User profile: Amateur
Cons: Because is age, doesn't have ultrasounds motor for AF. Vignetting on full frame camera.
Pros: Bokeh is very nice. surprisingly sharp wide open.
Summary: I bought it to replace my Sigma 10-20mm, when I was using an APS-C camera (KM D7D), to have the same focal range on my A850. I enjoy it. Of course, the Zeiss 16-35 is better in all domain but I can't afford it.
