Lenses
There are 1020 lenses in our database and 1333 owners opinions.
You can also
compare lenses side-by-side
Specifications:
| Manufacturer | Canon |
|---|---|
| Model | EF-S 17-55 mm f/2.8 IS USM |
| Lens style | Universal zoom |
| Focal length | 17 - 55 mm |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8 |
| Angle of view | 77.3 - 27.8 o |
| Closest focusing distance | 0.35 m |
| Maximum magnification | 1:5.88 |
| Minimum aperture | 22 |
| Number of diaphragm blades | 7 |
| Auto focus type | USM |
| Lens Construction | 19 elements / 12 groups |
| Filter diameter | 77 mm |
| Macro | No |
| Available mounts | Canon EF-S |
| Dimensions | 83.5 x 110.6 mm |
| Weight | 645 g |
| Additional information | Marketed March 2006 |
Average rating (11 owners reviews).
| Build quality | 3.27 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Optical quality | 4.64 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Value for money | 3.91 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Overall | 3.94 | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Build quality | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|---|---|
| Optical quality | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Value for money | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Overall | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Owner since: 3 years
Price: £700
User profile: Amateur
Cons: Build quality is adequate, but for the money would like better. Rediculous that non lens hood included for this kind of money. Or pouch!
Pros: Very sharp. Excellent IS. As good as an L lens if not better, for crop sensors.
Summary: Love mine. use this on my crop as a walk around lens. Never comes off(well seldom). Sometimes a little short on reach, but thats why I have the 70-200.
| Build quality | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|---|---|
| Optical quality | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Value for money | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Overall | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Owner since: 3 years
Price: in kit wit
User profile: Amateur
Cons: lots of unsharp photos with this lens
Pros: useful focus range on aps-c
Summary: Inferior to the tamron 17-50 I replaced it with
| Build quality | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|---|---|
| Optical quality | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Value for money | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Overall | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Owner since: 3 years
Price: 800 Euro
User profile: Amateur
Cons: Build quality. My copy have dust problems until added a UV filter. Crappy manual focus ring.
Pros: Excellent IQ, wide open. Excelent IS (photos at 0.5s: thats amazing)
Summary: This lens with a L build quality could be one of the best zooms in world. Excellent glass in a crappy enclosure.
| Build quality | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|---|---|
| Optical quality | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Value for money | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Overall | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Owner since: 3 years
Price: 800$
User profile: Semipro
Cons: Build quality could be better. Vignetting and bokeh could be a little better. High price. NO HOOD
Pros: Sharp at all apertures, colors and contrast. Excellent USM autofocus. Very good image stabilizer. Maybe the most versatile zoom lens. The best option for low light photography.
Summary: I use it mostly at f/2.8, and it's behaviour is excellent with a 550d.
| Build quality | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|---|---|
| Optical quality | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Value for money | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Overall | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Owner since: 2 years
Price: RM3850
User profile: Semipro
Cons: Lens hood not include, plastic build quality. Expensive for 'ef-s class'
Pros: high speed and very sharp, great for low light photography and wedding photography
Summary: buy it! if money doesn't matter
| Build quality | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|---|---|
| Optical quality | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Value for money | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Overall | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Owner since: 1 year
Price: 860€
User profile: Amateur
Cons: - build quality not on par withe the optical quality - a bit too expensive - bokeh "can" be nervous at some backrounds - no lenshood delivered - up to 70mm range would fit better to the teles 70-...
Pros: - outstanding optical quality - constant aperture of f2.8 - homogenous IQ over the full picture, perfectly suited for landscape - no weak wide end, the 17mm setting ist actually quite impressive, even wide open - good and useful range - effective stabilizer - build quality better than it seems first - sharpness can be up to some primes
Summary: It is simply the best high-speed, constant-aperture and stabilized standard-zoom for APS-C. Perfect walkarround lens, though expensive. More affordable alternatives like tamron & sigma are much cheaper but also optically a bit worse. I hated the hefty price tag, but love performance of the lens!
| Build quality | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|---|---|
| Optical quality | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Value for money | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Overall | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Owner since: 1 month
Price: 1050$
User profile: Semipro
Cons: Build Quality - Does not have that feeel! Slight sound while autofocusing Extends while zooming unlike 17-40 Price EF-S
Pros: Image quality! 5/5 Autofocus - very fast IS - Great stabilization (Gets quality images even at 1") Great range f/2.8 - Gets some nice blurry background even indoor.
Summary: My primary lens on 7D now. Its the best walk around lens for my purpose.
| Build quality | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|---|---|
| Optical quality | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Value for money | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Overall | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Owner since: 2 years
Price: 840€
User profile: Amateur
Cons: I can't complain enough about it's build quality. Well, it hasn't let me down yet but it doesn't make you confident at all. The lens has a tendency for zoom creep when pointed downwards. The zoom ring has some play after a while. The zoom action isn't linear. The paint wears out. No weather sealing. Colour rendition although it's hard to assess is colder than the much appreciated L lenses
Pros: Sharp everywhere, all the time. AF accuracy. Effective IS. Very reliable lens in terms of image quality.
Summary: This lens would be just perfect had it been built tightly with high quality components and a couple of rubber seals here and there. Now it's just a pricey very good lens.
| Build quality | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|---|---|
| Optical quality | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Value for money | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Overall | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Owner since: 3 months
Price: Used $800
User profile: Semipro
Cons: Price. This should be L level build quality for this price. It does not come with a hood and/or bag. It should for this price. Noticeable distortion at 17mm up to f/2.8. Big. Bigger than Tamron and Sigma. I would prefer a longer focus throw (degree of turn). Makes it easier to get pinpoint manual focus.
Pros: Very sharp throughout the entire zoom. IS is excellent. USM autofocus is fast. Focus ring is excellent
Summary: This is the best normal zoom lens for Canon APS-C. Slightly sharper than the Tamron or Sigma, especially at the edge. Much better feature set (USM and IS). However it is over priced. If this was an L lens with better weather seal and comes with hood/pouch it would justify the price. But it is not. I still bought it because I don't like the Tamron and Sigma lenses.
| Build quality | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|---|---|
| Optical quality | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Value for money | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Overall | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Owner since: 1 year
Price: 900
User profile: Amateur
Cons: Big (good filters can be expensive), No hood included
Pros: GREAT IQ; Sharp; Great low-light lens;
Summary: The best walk-around, general purpose lens for cropped-sensor Canons.
| Build quality | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|---|---|
| Optical quality | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Value for money | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Overall | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Owner since: 1 year
Price: ~ $ 1150
User profile: Semipro
Cons: - No hood included; COME ON Canon! - No seals; collected lots of dust within a few weeks. - Stabilizer broke after 2 months and had to be serviced. The wait was irritating. - Not a FF optic. ;)
Pros: - Sharp. No, not like this: SHARP. - Stabilized. - Great range.
Summary: I had this on a 30D as the only lens for over a year and was making due all right (except for theatre shoots where I naturally felt awkwardly). It's a great all around lens, if only it had been built better and had better QC...










