----- advertisement -----
Recommended


Support LensTip.com

Donations are welcome.

----- advertisement -----

Lenses

There are 1234 lenses in our database and 2313 owners opinions.

Search by:
Show only lenses reviewed by Lenstip.com

You can also
compare lenses side-by-side

 

Tamron SP AF 17-50 mm f/2.8 XR Di II LD Aspherical (IF)

Tamron SP AF 17-50 mm f/2.8 XR Di II LD Aspherical (IF)Tamron SP AF 17-50 mm f/2.8 XR Di II LD Aspherical (IF)Tamron SP AF 17-50 mm f/2.8 XR Di II LD Aspherical (IF)
 

Specifications:

Manufacturer Tamron
Model SP AF 17-50 mm f/2.8 XR Di II LD Aspherical (IF)
Lens style Universal zoom
Focal length 17 - 50 mm
Maximum aperture f/2.8
Angle of view 78.75 - 31.18 o
Closest focusing distance 0.27 m
Maximum magnification 1:4.5
Minimum aperture 32
Number of diaphragm blades 7
Auto focus type AF
Lens Construction 16 elements / 13 groups
Filter diameter 67 mm
Macro No
Available mounts Canon EF
Nikon F
Sony A / Minolta
Pentax K
Dimensions 74 x 81.7 mm
Weight 434 g
Additional information

Average rating (27 owners reviews).

Build quality 3.78
Optical quality 4.33
Value for money 4.81
Overall 4.31
Build quality
Optical quality
Value for money
Overall
User: Jake
IP 204.138.x.x
Date: 2013-12-28 15:14:44
Owner since: 6 months
Price: $400
User profile: Amateur
 

Cons: -Loud focus motor -Rotating front ring when focusing - No full time focus ring

Pros: -No problem with sharpness across the board. -Relativley inexpensive -Versitile due to wide angle and portait focal lengths -Constant aperture

Summary: Much better than any kit 18-55.

Build quality
Optical quality
Value for money
Overall
User: Mopsig
IP 195.245.x.x
Date: 2013-08-13 13:34:10
Owner since: 1 month
Price: 120,00 
User profile: Amateur
 

Cons: very soft at 17mm wide open

Pros: very sharp from 24mm up and f4 usable as macro lens

Summary: a very good 24mm to 50mm macro lens :)

Build quality
Optical quality
Value for money
Overall
User: Mike
IP 78.151.x.x
Date: 2013-03-02 16:18:20
Owner since: 1 year
Price: £279
User profile: Amateur
 

Cons: Can have terrible purple fringing in high contrast conditions. Would be good if the next revision of this lens was weather sealed.

Pros: Sharp, very sharp. Useful focal range. Fast enough. Very cheap.

Summary: A great value kit upgrade and walk around lens. It's on my K-5 most if the time. When it gets dusty or damaged I get a new one. My latest Chinese made copy is actually very good and as good as my last Made in Japan copy.

Build quality
Optical quality
Value for money
Overall
User: trautwyn
IP 193.22.x.x
Date: 2013-02-27 15:24:06
Owner since: 4 years
Price: 400 Euro
User profile: Amateur
 

Cons: lack of image stabilization AF is somewhat slow

Pros: f 2.8 over the full range quite lightweight somewhat limited range

Summary: great value for the price and a huge step forward. Although I would wish for a bit more reach on the long end, maybe up to 70mm

Build quality
Optical quality
Value for money
Overall
User: Doru
IP 193.239.x.x
Date: 2012-12-13 13:03:25
Owner since: 1 month
Price: 285 EUR
User profile: Amateur
 

Cons: slow/noisy auto focus, AF hunts in low light (like all lenses), CA at wide end.

Pros: f/2.8 all zoom range, nice colors, good IQ (image quality), SHARP, nice bokeh, compact, light, cheap.

Summary: yes, I have a new copy, this one it's sharp.

Build quality
Optical quality
Value for money
Overall
User: Doru
IP 193.239.x.x
Date: 2012-11-28 12:16:45
Owner since: 1 month
Price: 285 EUR
User profile: Amateur
 

Cons: soft, CA at wide end, slow & noisy AF

Pros: f/2.8, good color rendition, nice bokeh

Summary: Maybe I was "hit" with a bad copy of this lense, because is everithing but sharp.

Build quality
Optical quality
Value for money
Overall
User: Duron Maniac
IP 200.158.x.x
Date: 2012-08-12 20:41:30
Owner since: 1 month
Price:
User profile: Semipro
 

Cons: Doesn't have full time manual focus, AF is not so fast, focus ring turns during AF.

Pros: Great image quality, improves a lot in the long end stoping down to f/3.2 or f/3.5. Good body construction in the price range.

Summary: A good upgrade over standard kit lens (18-55). Lower cost doesn't mean low quality in this model. Recomended.

Build quality
Optical quality
Value for money
Overall
User: matteo
IP 79.21.x.x
Date: 2012-06-25 18:58:12
Owner since: 1 year
Price: 280
User profile: Amateur
 

Cons: quite slow autofocus (i think worst than canon18-55is) and not so perfect. at f 2.8 no good quality image in the center between 40-50mm, no stabilisation

Pros: aperture 2.8 works very good between 17-30, good grip in hand (manual focus to), good value for money (build quality, 17mm, f2.8, lens hood included)

Summary: For the price I payed I get a very good lens, not perfect but for what I need is good! I think the worst thing is the medium autofocus

Build quality
Optical quality
Value for money
Overall
User: M22
IP 188.106.x.x
Date: 2012-05-21 21:46:20
Owner since: 1 year
Price: 300 €
User profile: Amateur
 

Cons: Loud AF; out-of-focus-highlights tend to show an onion-shaped structure; mediocre bokeh; zoom is stiff and "sticky" - could be smoother

Pros: Sharpness and contrast across the focal range and wide open at f/2.8 (50mm is a little bit softer and needs f/4); "bang for the buck"; AF-accurecy is ok; compact design

Summary: In my opinion the best APS-C fixed-aperture standard zoom in this price region.

Build quality
Optical quality
Value for money
Overall
User: PhasedIN
IP 24.8.x.x
Date: 2012-02-24 04:40:26
Owner since: 1 month
Price: 330USD
User profile: Semipro
 

Cons: feels a bit plasticky compared to my 24mm L-glass, AF is a bit louder than Canon's USM drives (but I'll live with it, nothing to complain about, really); front element sticks out a bit (I would recommend a filter, well worth it); chromatic aberration at f2.8 (not significant at f4.0 and beyond)

Pros: LIGHT (this baby is only 430g, love that, bit time!); versatile: I shoot some landscapes, some portraits, this lens does it ALL with relatively good performance on my Canon 7D (I like that!); INEXPENSIVE (compared to some Canon APS-C and L-glass options... com'on Cannon! when I see a lens like this I realize that you are just gouging my pockets with your models.... 1000USD for the 17-55 f2.8 IS... seriously... get real! This lens beat it at 1/2 the price = #WINNER!!! (that's 'you loose' in twitter speak :)

Summary: if you're reading this you know what to do, BUY MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

Build quality
Optical quality
Value for money
Overall
User: Gawish
IP 41.235.x.x
Date: 2012-02-21 03:26:40
Owner since: 6 months
Price: 500
User profile: Semipro
 

Cons: Slightly inaccurate + Noisy AF Feels Plasticy, comparable to Canon kit lens build quality High distortion on 17mm

Pros: Very Sharp Minimal Vignetting Exceptional performance at 24mm up to 35mm

Summary: Worth the money, great walk-around lens. Very sharp, which is the most significant value in the end. Would definitely recommend to a friend

Build quality
Optical quality
Value for money
Overall
User: Adhi
IP 206.53.x.x
Date: 2011-10-28 21:16:09
Owner since: 1 month
Price: $300
User profile: Semipro
 

Cons: Poor build quality & AF accuracy, soft in wide open

Pros: Good price, Nice image but you must stop down to f4

Summary: Don't think about it, just take the picture

Build quality
Optical quality
Value for money
Overall
User: vietlh81
IP 193.48.x.x
Date: 2011-10-06 14:44:53
Owner since: 3 years
Price: 300
User profile: Amateur
 

Cons: Slow and noisy AF. No IS.

Pros: Sharp in wideopen. Cheap.

Summary: Good lens in range 17-50mm. Best for Pentax, sony.

Build quality
Optical quality
Value for money
Overall
User: aquadust
IP 15.203.x.x
Date: 2011-09-23 15:04:12
Owner since: 3 years
Price: 350EUR
User profile: Amateur
 

Cons: relatively slow and very noisy AF, not very tough build quality, focusing ring rotates during AF

Pros: PRICE, optical quality - sharp from wide open, nice colours and contrast, internal focusing, very good bokeh

Summary: "cheap" standard zoom lens for everyone, performs as it had hidden L-grade canon glasses inside :), almost as sharp as canon 17-55 which costs more than 900EUR. Ideal lens for shooting where you do not need extremely fast AF (all but sport)

Build quality
Optical quality
Value for money
Overall
User: GP
IP 87.23.x.x
Date: 2011-08-22 12:23:10
Owner since: 3 years
Price: 350 euro
User profile: Professional
 

Cons: no af override(sadly), no stabilization, only for DX af ring gets a bit in the way

Pros: The best PRO wide zoom in my bag! forget the nikons!forget the 17-55!forget the sigmas! i've checked and tried everything in the 24-70 equiv. range,as i use it a lot,and if you have any doubt go straight here.Nice handling,SUPERB image quality,decent at 2.8 and look what happens if you close it a bit to f/3.5-5! Even distortion and vignetting -if not corrected in post production,camera raw has a profile for this lens- manage to look pleasant,like 1-2 thousand euro nikon lenses(which i've got)!

Summary: Need a zoom in the 17-50 range?go get it. Don't confuse this gem with the poor VC version. This is not a great lens "for its cheap price",this is a great lens,this is THE lens to buy in that range.End of the story.

Build quality
Optical quality
Value for money
Overall
User: phototaxi
IP 89.204.x.x
Date: 2011-05-03 10:32:29
Owner since: 6 years
Price: 300€
User profile: Professional
 

Cons: AF loud and slow, random accuracy, wide open soft

Pros: you can take pictures

Summary: i sold the lens

Build quality
Optical quality
Value for money
Overall
User: Chris
IP 75.136.x.x
Date: 2010-11-12 06:29:35
Owner since: 1 year
Price: $450
User profile: Amateur
 

Cons: Smearing at the extreme edges, soft wide open(no big surprise there), AF hunts in low light

Pros: Light, Sharp at f4, low flare, low CA

Summary: An enjoyable lens, practically glued to my camera for the last year. For a zoom at this price it is an excellent value. The AF is sloppy compared to the EF85 1.8 USM, but is better then the EF50 1.8. Bokeh is a bit harsh, out of focus circles have a hard edge to them.

Build quality
Optical quality
Value for money
Overall
User: Cezary
IP 174.3.x.x
Date: 2010-10-11 06:39:04
Owner since: 2 years
Price: $400
User profile: Amateur
 

Cons: Excellent image quality. Very sharp from f4.0. It makes your prime lenses redundant! Very light lens.

Pros: No image stabilizer

Summary: This is one of the best lenses for the cropped sensor cameras. Great resolution and rendition of colors. This is the best value lens for your cropped sensor camera

Build quality
Optical quality
Value for money
Overall
User: rainer
IP 80.174.x.x
Date: 2010-10-06 21:03:22
Owner since: 1 year
Price: 220€
User profile: Semipro
 

Cons: a bit soft at 2.8, at Canon a bit dull colours, focus dizzy

Pros: sharp, prize, nice allrounder

Summary: Iam using this good lens with my Pentax K 20. I bought it used for 220€, so a big deal. Before I used the same lens with Canon, but I sold it, because it produced dull colours (Canon only produce nice colours with L-glass or the 10-22+15-85). Very sharp, good corners, few CA´s and few vignetting.

Build quality
Optical quality
Value for money
Overall
User: scottso
IP 74.109.x.x
Date: 2010-06-29 04:18:15
Owner since: 1 month
Price: used $310
User profile: Amateur
 

Cons: none

Pros: sharp ,f2.8,good color rendition, good value, reasonably quick accurate focusing and a little buzzy ( so what ),accesable manual focus ring,

Summary: you can spend 3x as much on a canon and get similar performance. IS model of tammy may be an option for $200. upgrade over kit,good focal length to go with 55/250 canon and a super wide. on crop body good portrait length

Build quality
Optical quality
Value for money
Overall
User: kamal
IP 85.9.x.x
Date: 2010-06-22 09:09:54
Owner since: 1 year
Price: 450$
User profile: Amateur
 

Cons: very slow focus

Pros: yery sherp

Summary: yery good walkaround lens for APS-C

Build quality
Optical quality
Value for money
Overall
User: Jeremiah
IP 94.197.x.x
Date: 2009-08-16 12:58:55
Owner since: 3 months
Price: $365
User profile: Semipro
 

Cons: slightly underwhelming build quality, a bit noisy, af/mf switch small and inconveniently placed, distortion @ wide end, and focus ring sometimes touches finger because it's so close to the zoom ring.

Pros: wonderfully sharp for the price, small & lightweight for being a fast lens, no lens creep, and great contrast + saturation of images. f/2.8!

Summary: (on a nikon d90) I LOVE this lens. i opted to forego the kit lens on the D90 for the increase in f-stop and am very happy with my choice. the cons listed are EXTREMELY minor and I got used to them within a few weeks; especially when i figured in the money i saved compared to a brand name lens. This is the perfect starter lens / walk-around lens for DX bodies and is the lens on my camera 80% of the time.

Build quality
Optical quality
Value for money
Overall
User: bugsier
IP 91.62.x.x
Date: 2009-08-09 14:17:12
Owner since: 2 years
Price: 360€
User profile: Professional
 

Cons: Autofocus is rather loud, not fully recommended for wedding photographers. Not weather sealed (but cannot be expected at this price tag!). Slight vignetting, but not disturbing.

Pros: Very sharp images, good for low-light shooting, good built quality, extermely cheap for what it offers

Summary: Highly recommended Lens for Canon 1.6 crop camera owners. There simply ain't any better "standard lens" for the EF-S mount available... yet.

Build quality
Optical quality
Value for money
Overall
User: MasterB
IP 217.96.x.x
Date: 2009-06-23 02:00:17
Owner since: 3 months
Price: 500 USD
User profile: Amateur
 

Cons: Some visible chromatic aberrations at wide angle. Autofocus is quite loud with its high-pitched buzz

Pros: Very sharp from f/2.8, fast autofocus (seems slower than it really is because it's quite loud) Good build quality, nothing is loose, nothing wobbles.

Summary: Excellent lens for APS-C, sharper than even Canon 17-55 f/2.8 Very nice design :) Oh, and it comes with a lens hood.

Build quality
Optical quality
Value for money
Overall
User: ss_sgp
IP 79.100.x.x
Date: 2009-05-23 12:10:39
Owner since: 1 year
Price: $450
User profile: Semipro
 

Cons: cons

Pros: pros

Summary: summary

Build quality
Optical quality
Value for money
Overall
User: Heyjijdaar
IP 193.202.x.x
Date: 2009-05-15 04:30:59
Owner since: 1 year
Price: 370 euro
User profile: Amateur
 

Cons: Blokeh not that smooth

Pros: Great in low light Scharp

Summary: This is a good lens, good build quality (although could always be better = als heavier).

Build quality
Optical quality
Value for money
Overall
User: jpfigueiredo
IP 87.196.x.x
Date: 2009-05-13 13:52:09
Owner since: 1 year
Price: 370€
User profile: Amateur
 

Cons: Awful distortion at wide end. Slow, erratic focus (sometimes).

Pros: Very sharp, even wide open. Perfect size/weight. Overall, excellent value for money.

Summary: Perfect walkaround lens for APS-C sensors.


Build quality 0 1 2 3 4 5
Optical quality 0 1 2 3 4 5
Value for money 0 1 2 3 4 5