Lens review
Sigma 18-200 mm f/3.5-6.3 II DC OS HSM
7. Coma, astigmatism and bokeh

When it comes to astigmatism, in the case the predecessor it depended strongly on the focal length. At the shorter end it was just 4% and at the longer focal lengths – 14%. In the case of the Sigma 18-200 mm II the situation is different because you can’t notice such disproportions. In the 18-50 mm range the astigmatism amounts to 5% so within the margin of error the same value like that of its predecessor; in the 100-200 mm range it increases to 8% so is noticeably lower than the performance presented by the first 18-200 mm OS model.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
These small circles of light, showing a defocused image of a diode, don’t look nice. The images are jagged at edges and consist of many concentric rings, alternately darker and lighter, with changing intensity.




