Carl Zeiss Distagon T* 25 mm f/2.0 ZE/ZF.2
6. Distortion
Please Support UsIf you enjoy our reviews and articles, and you want us to continue our work please, support our website by donating through PayPal. The funds are going to be used for paying our editorial team, renting servers, and equipping our testing studio; only that way we will be able to continue providing you interesting content for free. |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
The Zeiss has a bit narrower angle of view than the 24 mm constructions so the distortion correction is a tad easier. What’s interesting it has a smaller discrepancy than its competitors between the performance on a small and big sensor. On the APS-C sensor we observe slight barrel distortion of –1.11% which increases to –1.96% on full frame. The Zeiss is worse than the Nikkor but it fares similarly to the Canon and noticeably better than the Samyang.
|
Zeiss Distagon 2.0/25 |
Samyang 1.4/24 |
Nikkor AF-S 1.4/24 |
Canon 1.4/24 II |
APS-C/DX |
−1.11% |
−1.27% |
−0.79% |
−0.82% |
FF |
−1.96% |
−2.48% |
−1.27% |
–2.03% |
Canon 50D, 25 mm | |||
Canon 1Ds MkIII, 25 mm | |||