Lenses
There are 1020 lenses in our database and 1333 owners opinions.
You can also
compare lenses side-by-side
Sigma 24-70 mm f/2.8 EX DG Macro
Specifications:
| Manufacturer | Sigma |
|---|---|
| Model | 24-70 mm f/2.8 EX DG Macro |
| Lens style | Universal zoom |
| Focal length | 24 - 70 mm |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8 |
| Angle of view | 84.1 - 34.3 o |
| Closest focusing distance | 0.4 m |
| Maximum magnification | 1:3.8 |
| Minimum aperture | 32 |
| Number of diaphragm blades | 9 |
| Auto focus type | AF |
| Lens Construction | 14 elements / 13 groups |
| Filter diameter | 82 mm |
| Macro | Yes |
| Available mounts | Canon EF Nikon F Sony A / Minolta Pentax K |
| Dimensions | 88.6 x 115.5 mm |
| Weight | 700 g |
| Additional information |
Average rating (2 owners reviews).
| Build quality | 5.00 |  |
|---|---|---|
| Optical quality | 4.00 |  |
| Value for money | 4.50 |  |
| Overall | 4.50 | |
| Build quality |  |
|---|---|
| Optical quality | |
| Value for money | |
| Overall | |
Owner since: 6 months
Price: 600 euro
User profile: Amateur
Cons: Large diameter for filters (82mm). Lens are extended at 24mm and if you are using this lens on 24 with internal flash in the lower side of the picture you'll have a semi-circular shadow.
Pros: Very sharp and can isolate very well the subject. Image quality is almost the same if you compare with Canon 24-70 USM L which is very expensive.
Summary: I would recomend this lens.
| Build quality | |
|---|---|
| Optical quality | |
| Value for money | |
| Overall | |
Owner since: 4 years
Price:
User profile: Amateur
Cons: -Heavy -82mm filter -If you don't use full frame then there are lighter lenses.
Pros: -Good zoom range -2.8! -I have never had to blame a bad photo on it.
Summary: A good value. When I got it it was more expensive but it has been good. I'm changing camera mounts and will probably get a 17-70 that is lighter and has stabalization. I used this one on a little sensor so I never saw any corner blur.
