Lenses
There are 1031 lenses in our database and 1494 owners opinions.
You can also
compare lenses side-by-side
Sigma 28-300 mm f/3.5-6.3 DG Macro
Specifications:
| Manufacturer | Sigma |
|---|---|
| Model | 28-300 mm f/3.5-6.3 DG Macro |
| Lens style | Universal zoom |
| Focal length | 28 - 300 mm |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5 - 6.3 |
| Angle of view | 75.4 - 8.2 o |
| Closest focusing distance | 0.5 m |
| Maximum magnification | 1:3 |
| Minimum aperture | 22 |
| Number of diaphragm blades | 8 |
| Auto focus type | AF |
| Lens Construction | 15 elements / 13 groups |
| Filter diameter | 62 mm |
| Macro | Yes |
| Available mounts | Canon EF Nikon F Sony A / Minolta Sigma Pentax K |
| Dimensions | 74 x 86 mm |
| Weight | 490 g |
| Additional information |
Average rating (2 owners reviews).
| Build quality | 3.00 |   |
|---|---|---|
| Optical quality | 1.50 |  |
| Value for money | 3.00 | |
| Overall | 2.50 | |
| Build quality |  |
|---|---|
| Optical quality | |
| Value for money | |
| Overall | |
Owner since: 1 month
Price: borrowed
User profile: Semipro
Cons: not sharp, slow lens, massive CA stopping down doesnt help.. 28mm not wide enough on crop sensors, forget about corner to corner sharpness NEEDS OS..
Pros: good focal range for most situations. macro ability (barely qualifies) vignetting is okay focusing is quiet considering lack of HSM.
Summary: i wouldnt buy this lens. just stick to canons 70-200 telephotos.
| Build quality | |
|---|---|
| Optical quality | |
| Value for money | |
| Overall | |
Owner since: 6 months
Price: borrowed
User profile: Semipro
Cons: - Not sharp. - Slow max. aperture, which also affected focus at longer focal lengths (to the point of making it almost inoperable).
Pros: - Usable in (very) controlled conditions. - You don't have to change lenses.
Summary: God I hated this one. It has all the shortcomings of an ultrazoom and not really a bright side. Except being able to shoot at all - in controlled conditions of course. I did have a few decent pictures with this lens but it was in spite of it rather than thanks to it.
