LensTip.com

Lens review

Canon EF-S 10-22 mm f/3.5-4.5 USM

23 September 2007
Arkadiusz Olech

8. Vignetting

In this category we did not expect good results - the laws of physics cannot be changed. One cannot make a large size wide angle lens, which would not show light, fall off in the corners of the frame.

The vignetting is therefore a serious problem in the whole focal lengths' range but the greatest is for 10 mm. In this case, with a wide open aperture, the light fall off reaches as much as 47% (-1.8 the value of the diaphragm). Stopping down the lens to f/4.0 makes the values decrease to 25% and to f/8.0 to 20%. For a 17 mm focal length and the f/4.0 diaphragm the light fall off in the corners of the frame was 41%. Stopping down to f/5.6 diminishes the problem to 22% and to f/8.0 to over just 10-20%. We observed almost the same situation for 22 mm. Here with a wide open aperture, vignetting values of 41%., drop to 24% for f/5.6 and to 17% for f/8.0.

Canon EF-S 10-22 mm f/3.5-4.5 USM - Vignetting


Please Support Us

If you enjoy our reviews and articles, and you want us to continue our work please, support our website by donating through PayPal. The funds are going to be used for paying our editorial team, renting servers, and equipping our testing studio; only that way we will be able to continue providing you interesting content for free.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - advertisement - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


To sum it up, the vignetting in the Canon 10-22 mm is big, even stopping down the lens for two or three stops does not make the results acceptable. This would be intolerable for regular lenses, but such a specific lens as the Canon 10-22 mm can be forgiven. If we wanted to decrease the vignetting, while still maintaining the wide angle and the aperture/light (???) aperture, the lens designers would have to increase the size of the lens, which would not be acceptable for most users.