Sigma A 24 mm f/1.4 DG DN – first impressions and sample images
3. Autofocus and several words about optical properties
Of course it is possible to draw initial conclusions about the quality of optics by looking at sample shots, published at the end of this material. It is clear that image quality is good even at the maximum relative aperture but I have an impression that the 1.4/20 model fared a tad better.
The Sigma A 1.4/24 shows distinctly lower vignetting for a change and its vaue we estimate as about 3 EV. It's a lot but it's always good to check reference levels. The wider, heavier Sigma 1.4/24 designed for reflex cameras, with a bigger front element, had vignetting of −2.94 EV. Keeping a similar level of brightness loss in case of a smaller, lighter lens designed for mirrorless systems is a praiseworth achievement.
Please Support UsIf you enjoy our reviews and articles, and you want us to continue our work please, support our website by donating through PayPal. The funds are going to be used for paying our editorial team, renting servers, and equipping our testing studio; only that way we will be able to continue providing you interesting content for free. |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
In case of the top Art line Sigma optics specialists don't give up on distortion correction, passing that task to camera's software – our photos show it clearly. You can observe just slight barrel distortion of about -1.3%, a result very similar to -1.2% shown by the DSRL predecessor of this lens.
Sony A7R III, 24 mm, JPEG | |||
![]() |
![]() |
It's worth mentioning here that the autofocus module is often a feature that can be significantly improved in the final version of a lens so we hope the final specimen of the new Sigma will perform a bit better in this category.