Lenses
There are 1020 lenses in our database and 1341 owners opinions.
You can also
compare lenses side-by-side
Sigma 17-35 mm f/2.8-4 EX DG HSM Aspherical
Specifications:
| Manufacturer | Sigma |
|---|---|
| Model | 17-35 mm f/2.8-4 EX DG HSM Aspherical |
| Lens style | Wide angle zoom |
| Focal length | 17 - 35 mm |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8 - 4 |
| Angle of view | 103.7 - 63.4 o |
| Closest focusing distance | 0.27 m |
| Maximum magnification | 1:4.5 |
| Minimum aperture | 45 |
| Number of diaphragm blades | 8 |
| Auto focus type | AF HSM |
| Lens Construction | 16 elements / 13 groups |
| Filter diameter | 77 mm |
| Macro | No |
| Available mounts | Canon EF Nikon F Sony A / Minolta Sigma Pentax K |
| Dimensions | 83.5 x 86.2 mm |
| Weight | 560 g |
| Additional information | No HSM in version for KM/Sony and Pentax/Samsung |
Average rating (3 owners reviews).
| Build quality | 4.33 |   |
|---|---|---|
| Optical quality | 4.00 |  |
| Value for money | 4.67 | |
| Overall | 4.33 | |
| Build quality |  |
|---|---|
| Optical quality | |
| Value for money | |
| Overall | |
Owner since: 3 months
Price: 180£
User profile: Semipro
Cons: Exterior texture, 77mm filter, front or back focus sometimes, soft borders (manly in full frame).
Pros: Accessible "PRO" wide angle, sharp when in focus, good look (with distance window), comes with case and lens hood.
Summary: Itīs a good lens for landscapes or street or even at home or studio with good flash light. It produces good images but not always.Sometimes it is difficult to have a sharp shot with flash at f/2,8 or f/4. In full frame I think it is very soft.
| Build quality | |
|---|---|
| Optical quality | |
| Value for money | |
| Overall | |
Owner since: 6 months
Price: 120 euros
User profile: Semipro
Cons: Light falloff, not really f/2.8 @ 17mm, not that sharp wide open, bulky, HSM focus system is vulnerable and not that accurate, mine kept making weird sound for about 3 months, then it stopped, a friend of mine had the same "feature" but in the end the focusing stopped working!
Pros: Well build & damped, very cheap secondhand, not bad distortions, covers FF, skip on DX, gets sharper from f/4 ->
Summary: A cheap alternative for real FF wideangle monsters like 14-24 or 17-35, falls a bit short but for the money it does everything it promises.
| Build quality | |
|---|---|
| Optical quality | |
| Value for money | |
| Overall | |
Owner since: 1 year
Price: preowned f
User profile: Amateur
Cons: 17-35 can be too short Needs 77mm filters
Pros: Sharp Quiet and accurate focusing (Nikon) Excellent build quality Price FULL FRAME !!!
Summary: Great lens, on DX you get 26-50 with good sharpness across the range. Works also with full frame cameras.
