----- advertisement -----
Recommended

----- advertisement -----

Lenses

There are 1031 lenses in our database and 1495 owners opinions.

Search by:
Show only lenses reviewed by Lenstip.com

You can also
compare lenses side-by-side

 

Nikon Nikkor AF-S DX 18-105 mm f/3.5-5.6 VR ED

Nikon Nikkor AF-S DX 18-105 mm f/3.5-5.6 VR EDNikon Nikkor AF-S DX 18-105 mm f/3.5-5.6 VR EDNikon Nikkor AF-S DX 18-105 mm f/3.5-5.6 VR ED
 

Specifications:

Manufacturer Nikon Nikkor
Model AF-S DX 18-105 mm f/3.5-5.6 VR ED
Lens style Universal zoom
Focal length 18 - 105 mm
Maximum aperture f/3.5 - 5.6
Angle of view 76.5 - 15.4 o
Closest focusing distance 0.45 m
Maximum magnification 1:5
Minimum aperture 36
Number of diaphragm blades 7
Auto focus type SWM
Lens Construction 15 elements / 11 groups
Filter diameter 67 mm
Macro No
Available mounts Nikon F
Dimensions 76 x 89 mm
Weight 480 g
Additional information

Average rating (13 owners reviews).

Build quality 2.77
Optical quality 3.46
Value for money 4.38
Overall 3.54
Build quality
Optical quality
Value for money
Overall
User: leteuf
IP 83.167.x.x
Date: 2012-04-06 13:06:51
Owner since: 3 years
Price: €200
User profile: Amateur
 

Cons: Plastic baionnet. A bit slow aperture at longer end

Pros: Very good sharpness, useful range

Summary: Most of the time, I don't need another lens

Build quality
Optical quality
Value for money
Overall
User: Verdict
IP 89.166.x.x
Date: 2012-03-17 07:58:17
Owner since: 3 years
Price: 235€
User profile: Semipro
 

Cons: plastic bayonet needs bigger aperture :)

Pros: value for price is awesome VR function image quality superfast autofocus with no errors overall performance

Summary: must have for those who still uses their 18-50 kit lenses, and doesn't wanna buy more expensive 18-200 Nikkor

Build quality
Optical quality
Value for money
Overall
User: Gorbstein
IP 193.39.x.x
Date: 2012-01-17 15:34:49
Owner since: 2 years
Price:
User profile: Semipro
 

Cons: Flare. Horrendous, uncorrectable flare at all settings even with the sun far out of shot. Heavy distortion VR not as good as expected

Pros: Very sharp Quite light Great range

Summary: Not sure why so many people are rating the optical quality is low. I find this lens to be very sharp, if you compare the reviews between this and the 17-55 f2.8 nikkor, it doesn't come off too badly. Also, build quality is not good, but for the price range it is more than acceptable. Being a mountain photographer I gladly accept the lighter weight. Biggest problem is the flare when using outside; as soon as the sun comes near the corner of a shot, it'll land streaks and blobs all over the frame. It could do with a much better / bigger lens hood. I find this a convenient all round lens, especially for mountain / landscape / hiking photography. The distortion and vignetting problems are easily cured, but the flare completely destroys images. If this problem could be solved in a version 2, I would buy it in an instant, and would probably not need another lens.

Build quality
Optical quality
Value for money
Overall
User: SLHR
IP 79.125.x.x
Date: 2011-12-31 15:01:50
Owner since: 2 years
Price:
User profile: Amateur
 

Cons: Very bad build quality. Everything rattles. Very weak plastic mount, inappropriate for such a "heavy lens" and easily breaks (mine broke twice). Significant distortion at low end. Optical quality degrades at 105mm. It focuses quite slow. No (semi)macro capabilities (magnification of only 1:5); cannot be used with macro rings.

Pros: Good zoom range. Low cost. Reasonable optical quality.

Summary: Good walk-around lens that comes in a kit with some Nikon DSLRs. I would not buy it separately - there are better alternatives, although the zoom range is quite appealing.

Build quality
Optical quality
Value for money
Overall
User: Gianfranco
IP 2.39.x.x
Date: 2011-12-26 11:19:59
Owner since: 3 years
Price:
User profile: Amateur
 

Cons: Poorly built, plastic bayonet is known to break easily

Pros: VR, very convenient focal length range, passable image quality

Summary: A convenient lens just a step above the cheaper kit lenses, but somewhat poorly-built and image quality is nothing more than acceptable.

Build quality
Optical quality
Value for money
Overall
User: kiwichas
IP 118.93.x.x
Date: 2011-10-06 10:52:59
Owner since: 1 month
Price: 350
User profile: Amateur
 

Cons: Soft over 50mm Decentered Dull viewfinder and slow AF indoors Bad distortion at wide end Unacceptable really Does not compare with my 28-70 3.5-4.5 D

Pros: Can probably sell it

Summary: Don't do it

Build quality
Optical quality
Value for money
Overall
User: paparom
IP 79.18.x.x
Date: 2011-06-14 20:05:47
Owner since: 2 years
Price: 260 euro
User profile: Semipro
 

Cons: notevole perdita progressiva di qualità a tutte le focali da f 7,1 a f16. discreta perdita di qualità ai bordi alle massime aperture, soprattutto da 24 a 105 mm. Autofocus non molto veloce e un pò rumoroso.

Pros: Leggerezza, basso prezzo, estensione focale.

Summary: buona lente tuttofare.

Build quality
Optical quality
Value for money
Overall
User: sushi
IP 82.120.x.x
Date: 2011-04-04 23:39:53
Owner since: 1 year
Price: 250 euros
User profile: Amateur
 

Cons: high distortion. Only 3.5 5.6 focal

Pros: useful for everything

Summary: useful amateur lens

Build quality
Optical quality
Value for money
Overall
User: Luis M Carrascal
IP 212.166.x.x
Date: 2011-03-27 23:20:18
Owner since: 2 years
Price: 250 €
User profile: Amateur
 

Cons: Vigneting @ f8 in the long focal length.

Pros: High quality lens regarding optical quality @ f8 f11. Very low weight for mountain photography and long walks. The longer focal lengths are very useful for real landscape photography. True 3 stops at short focal lengths and 2 stops at longer focal lengths of benefit using VR. Very useful with small tripods.

Summary: A very good lens for pragmatic photographers in rough terrain and long walks.

Build quality
Optical quality
Value for money
Overall
User: Roberto
IP 62.98.x.x
Date: 2011-03-19 11:40:30
Owner since: 1 year
Price: 220 €
User profile: Amateur
 

Cons: L'autofocus spesso sbaglia, e non è veloce

Pros: Buona nitidezza, estremamente leggero ed economico, ottimo rapporto qualità prezzo

Summary: Se non avete molti soldi da spendere e volete cavarvela in tutte le situazioni è un ottima lente

Build quality
Optical quality
Value for money
Overall
User: PeterB666
IP 202.10.x.x
Date: 2011-01-08 05:56:01
Owner since: 1 month
Price: 300
User profile: Amateur
 

Cons: Reasonably high distorsion at 18mm, plastic lens mount

Pros: Good zoom range, very good from 24mm to 105mm, effective image stabilisation.

Summary: I bought the 18-105mm after having a play with the 18-55 non-VR lens. I was looking for the 18-70mm lens but these are fairly scarce. I must say I am impressed with this lens. It isn't perfect but does make a good compromise between usability, size and quality. Overall it is very good value and execeptional if get it bundled in with a camera. I found the IQ to be at least as good, if not better than the 18-55mm but there isn't much in it. I like the focus ring not rotating which just ruins the 18-55 lenses. Distorstion is a little higher than ideal at 18mm but is reasonable at other focal lengths. It is easy enough to correct in CS5 anyway. It would be nice to have a slightly faster lens but that would add to the cost, size and weight. The VR is very effective and the close focus at 105mm is reasonable. I find the lens very sharp and the AF accurate. It would be nice to have a distance scale for MF but the MF still works fine.

Build quality
Optical quality
Value for money
Overall
User: Elijah
IP 118.90.x.x
Date: 2009-10-04 18:51:46
Owner since: 1 year
Price: bought wit
User profile: Amateur
 

Cons: plastic bayonet; it's a cheap lens so I wouldn't expect too much from it - feels exactly the same as other lenses within this price range; some distortion at 18mm, but again - no worse than other cheap lenses

Pros: sharp! it's a killer - miles better than other lenses, especially Nikkor 18-200, Tamron 18-270 or Sigma (I have compared them myself) ! also, great range makes it fantastic walkaround lens, superb stabilization

Summary: Excellent lens for the price - you can't get any better walkaround lens

Build quality
Optical quality
Value for money
Overall
User: ggrand
IP 89.102.x.x
Date: 2009-08-25 10:46:15
Owner since: 3 months
Price:
User profile: Amateur
 

Cons: Slow AF(like 18-55),sometimes AF misses, distortion, it could have bigger sunshade, plastic bayonet(maybe just for better feeling), bad MF focus-MF ring is too loose, some vignetting, too long the shortest focus distance

Pros: Focal range,good ghost and flare resistance, instant MF, good function of VR, sharp wide open, no zoom creep

Summary: Optically it is little bit weaker than 18-55II / VR but with great focal range. It is good all-around lens when you count in its price.


Build quality 0 1 2 3 4 5
Optical quality 0 1 2 3 4 5
Value for money 0 1 2 3 4 5