----- advertisement -----
Recommended

----- advertisement -----

Lenses

There are 1031 lenses in our database and 1495 owners opinions.

Search by:
Show only lenses reviewed by Lenstip.com

You can also
compare lenses side-by-side

 

Panasonic G VARIO 14-45 mm f/3.5-5.6 ASPH. M.O.I.S.

Panasonic G VARIO 14-45 mm f/3.5-5.6 ASPH. M.O.I.S.
 

Specifications:

Manufacturer Panasonic
Model G VARIO 14-45 mm f/3.5-5.6 ASPH. M.O.I.S.
Lens style Universal zoom
Focal length 14 - 45 mm
Maximum aperture f/3.5 - 5.6
Angle of view 75 - 27 o
Closest focusing distance 0.3 m
Maximum magnification 1:2.9
Minimum aperture 22
Number of diaphragm blades 7
Auto focus type AF
Lens Construction 12 elements / 9 groups
Filter diameter 52 mm
Macro No
Available mounts Micro Four Thirds
Dimensions 60 x 60 mm
Weight 195 g
Additional information

Average rating (5 owners reviews).

Build quality 4.40
Optical quality 4.40
Value for money 4.40
Overall 4.40
Build quality
Optical quality
Value for money
Overall
User: matadoerle
IP 134.3.x.x
Date: 2012-04-12 17:09:43
Owner since: 3 years
Price: kit includ
User profile: Amateur
 

Cons: nothing to complain about

Pros: well build and good balanced, acceptable fast autofocus, sharp to very sharp pictures, shipped with lens hood and lens bag and two caps

Summary: It's a kit lens but still worth more than that. It's acceptable fast, is very sharp and has an acceptable bokeh for such a lens.

Build quality
Optical quality
Value for money
Overall
User: Canonicus
IP 95.147.x.x
Date: 2012-02-20 20:25:49
Owner since: 1 month
Price:
User profile: Amateur
 

Cons: Limited range-slow at tele end, macro range limited

Pros: Small. Sharp and smooth to zoom

Summary: Traded the 14-42mm that came with the G3 kit as it had an unaceptab le plastic mount and the zoom did not feel smooth. All the reports found the 14-45mm slightly better in all respects. Photios so far up to expectations with good saturation and excellent stabilisation. However, I moved from a Canon 450d to downsize and miss the speed of the fabulous Sigma 17-70mm which had 2.8 at the wide end and f4 at the longer tele end. However, the Sigma costs about £300 and the Panny can be bought for half that or less on ebay. The Sigma is also a huge lens and if you are into downsizing, as I am, the Panny is first rate. Sigma are moving into micro4/3rds so we should soon see some interesting alternatives to the brand name lenses

Build quality
Optical quality
Value for money
Overall
User: Anecolove
IP 202.156.x.x
Date: 2011-03-28 18:10:22
Owner since: 1 month
Price: S$210
User profile: Amateur
 

Cons: Small aperture, macro ability inferior to oly 1442, size bigger than oly counterpart

Pros: Very sharp for a kit lens, distortion minimal after correction, useful focal length, effective OIS

Summary: A very good standard zoom for M4/3. I got tired of the fixed angle of view of the 20 1.7, so I bought this lens and I do not regret. Though it significantly increases the size of the GF1, it is still relatively small compared to SLRs.

Build quality
Optical quality
Value for money
Overall
User: equitis
IP 77.0.x.x
Date: 2011-01-28 16:45:57
Owner since: 6 months
Price: N/A: kit-l
User profile: Amateur
 

Cons: Macro / Closeup photography limited, slightly soft at 45 mm

Pros: good optical quality for a standard kit lens; effective OIS; silent and fast AF

Summary: good lens for standard situations

Build quality
Optical quality
Value for money
Overall
User: Michael Shea
IP 82.34.x.x
Date: 2011-01-17 20:53:31
Owner since: 2 years
Price: N/A: kit l
User profile: Amateur
 

Cons: Small apertures best avoided because they give very soft results. It took me ages to realise than anything lower than f8 is hardly ever needed.

Pros: A versatile lens. Very good results all around the frame and throughout the zoom range. Sharpening of RAW images is always needed though and the default Lightroom and ACR settings will rarely be enough.

Summary: By all accounts a far better standard kit lens than anything Olympus have thus far produced. Presumably Panasonic provided the inferior 14-42mm on later cameras simply to keep the prices down. A very good lens indeed.


Build quality 0 1 2 3 4 5
Optical quality 0 1 2 3 4 5
Value for money 0 1 2 3 4 5