Lenses
There are 1105 lenses in our database and 1920 owners opinions.
You can also
compare lenses side-by-side
Specifications:
| Manufacturer | Nikon Nikkor |
|---|---|
| Model | AF-S 70-200 mm f/2.8G ED VR II |
| Lens style | Telephoto zoom |
| Focal length | 70 - 200 mm |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8 |
| Angle of view | 34.2 - 12.2 o |
| Closest focusing distance | 1.4 m |
| Maximum magnification | 1:8.3 |
| Minimum aperture | 22 |
| Number of diaphragm blades | 9 |
| Auto focus type | SWM |
| Lens Construction | 21 elements / 16 groups |
| Filter diameter | 77 mm |
| Macro | No |
| Available mounts | Nikon F |
| Dimensions | 209 x 87 mm |
| Weight | 1540 g |
| Additional information |
Average rating (5 owners reviews).
| Build quality | 5.00 |  |
|---|---|---|
| Optical quality | 5.00 | |
| Value for money | 4.20 |  |
| Overall | 4.73 |  |
| Build quality |  |
|---|---|
| Optical quality | |
| Value for money | |
| Overall | |
Owner since: 3 months
Price: € 16
User profile: Amateur
Cons: Slight CAs at long focal lenghts.
Pros: Optical performance except CAs at long focal lengths. VR performance. AF performance. Build Q.
Summary: Great for upper-amateurs. Pro's spend 3,5 as much for a 200mm prime having twice the light performance.
| Build quality | |
|---|---|
| Optical quality | |
| Value for money | |
| Overall | |
Owner since: 1 year
Price:
User profile: Amateur
Cons:
Pros:
Summary:
| Build quality | |
|---|---|
| Optical quality | |
| Value for money | |
| Overall | |
Owner since: 3 months
Price:
User profile: Amateur
Cons: .
Pros: .
Summary: .
| Build quality | |
|---|---|
| Optical quality | |
| Value for money | |
| Overall | |
Owner since: 1 year
Price:
User profile: Professional
Cons: 1
Pros: 1
Summary: 1
| Build quality | |
|---|---|
| Optical quality | |
| Value for money | |
| Overall | |
Owner since: 1 month
Price: £1799
User profile: Amateur
Cons: The lens design suffers more from what is a small effect on most other zooms, namely the reduction in focal length for closer subjects. The 200mm becomes about 140mm at 10ft. This is not a problem for me, as I shoot motorsports at a longer range, but street, portrait, or wedding photographers might not like this. Pricey. (The 'flaking' problem reported by others is not present on my example.)
Pros: Fast focus, edge-to-edge sharp, very good contrast, no vignetting on a FX, best VR operation yet. This is a step up on the previous 70-200, which was an exceptional lens on a DX crop camera, but now it has been designed for FX to eliminate the slight vignetting seen on a FX with a VR1 The 'nano coating' works well to give better contrast than the VR1. More sharpness at the edges than the VR1 too. Same solid build.
Summary: A super lens so far for me. Better than all the other telephoto zooms that I have owned. Sharp, quick and correctly focused, with bright coours. A lens I will keep for a long time and use regularly. So, even the initially high price will not matter.
