LensTip.com

Lenses

There are 1648 lenses in our database and 3134 owners opinions.

You can also
compare lenses side-by-side

Search by:

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 25 mm f/1.8

Pictures:
Specifications:
Manufacturer Olympus
Model M.Zuiko Digital 25 mm f/1.8
Lens style Normal
Focal length 25 mm
Maximum aperture f/1.8
Angle of view 47 o
Closest focusing distance 0.25 m
Maximum magnification 1:8.3
Minimum aperture 22
Number of diaphragm blades 7
Auto focus type AF MSC
Lens Construction 9 elements / 7 groups
Filter diameter 46 mm
Macro No
Available mounts Micro Four Thirds
Dimensions 57.8 x 42 mm
Weight 137 g
Additional information
Average rating (3 owners reviews)
Build quality
Optical quality
Value for money

Overall

4.44 Good
Owners reviews (3)
  1. zavinac
    zavinac 12 October 2016, 09:56
    Build quality
    Optical quality
    Value for money

    Overall

    IP 91.213.x.x
    Owner since: 2 years
    Price: 360
    User profile: Amateur

    Cons: a little too much LoCA (longitudinal chromatic aberration)

    Pros: good optical quality, nice bokeh

    Summary: A very nice lens overall with a little too much LoCA and a bit too expensive.

  2. Ulfie
    Ulfie 26 July 2015, 22:03
    Build quality
    Optical quality
    Value for money

    Overall

    IP 158.104.x.x
    Owner since: 1 year
    Price: US $275, u
    User profile: Amateur

    Cons: A bit flimsy lens hood mount but hardly use it so no big deal. Thus the 4 instead of 5 for build quality. (I'd rate it 4.5 but that's not possible above.)

    Pros: Very solid and well-made. Mounts to camera body (Oly E-PL1) tightly and securely. Over time never any wobble whatsoever. Very sharp, high-resolution even wide open at f/1.8. Bokeh is smooth and pleasant. Included lens hood. Focuses fast and sure even on this "older" camera body.

    Summary: Overall one cannot ask for a better "normal", 50mm-equivalent-FOV lens for m4/3s at this price. If one doesn't need or want f/1.4 or even f/0.95, then this is a no-brainer to buy. I used the Panny 20/1.7 before but find I don't "see" photographically with a 40mm-equivalency. It's a good lens too but for 50mme, the Oly is fine. Period. You cannot go wrong with this lens.

  3. MM
    MM 10 July 2015, 12:48
    Build quality
    Optical quality
    Value for money

    Overall

    IP 86.67.x.x
    Owner since: 3 months
    Price: 250 €
    User profile: Amateur

    Cons: Build quality under the 17 mm f/1,8, but it seems not "cheap" Lenshood mounting is not very practical

    Pros: Light and bright Very good image quality even wide open

    Summary: It is my better lens for the moment. It's very sharp in the center and the corners are good. Bokeh is nice and it has a good rendering. I like this lens very much, but 50 mm equivalent can be a bit too long for all around shooting.

Add your opinion

Build quality 0 1 2 3 4 5
Optical quality 0 1 2 3 4 5
Value for money 0 1 2 3 4 5