There are 2161 lenses in our database and 3523 owners opinions.
You can also
compare lenses side-by-side
Search by:
Sigma A 135 mm f/1.8 DG HSM
Pictures:
Specifications:
Manufacturer | Sigma |
---|---|
Model | A 135 mm f/1.8 DG HSM |
Lens style | Telephoto |
Focal length | 135 mm |
Maximum aperture | f/1.8 |
Angle of view | 18.2 o |
Closest focusing distance | 0.8 m |
Maximum magnification | 1:5 |
Minimum aperture | 16 |
Number of diaphragm blades | 9 |
Auto focus type | HSM |
Lens Construction | 13 elements / 10 groups |
Filter diameter | 82 mm |
Macro | No |
Available mounts | Canon EF Nikon F Sigma Sony E Sony FE L-mount/Leica-SL |
Dimensions | 91.4 x 114.9 mm |
Weight | 1130 g |
Additional information | Announced. 21.02.2017 SLD and FLD elements |
Owners reviews (5)
Add your opinion
Overall
Owner since: 6 months
Price: 700 Euro
User profile: Amateur
Cons: Heavy and awkward. Does not take distance rings or Sigma 1.4 converter. Bokeh is, for my taste, too clean.the diameter is so big, compared to the Nikon 135/2 that you can focus it as quickly. Also, I found dust in mine which doesn\'t speak for the sealing.
Pros: Very sharp, silent and fast.
Summary: Sold mine after only 6 months. I rather use my 150/ 2.8 Macro for portraits or the 85 1.4 OLD Sigma, which is small, as fast and nicer bokeh.
Overall
Owner since: 1 year
Price: ¥7071
User profile: Amateur
Cons: Not that accurate autofocus when tracking someting moving fast.
Pros: Outstanding contrast and sharpness from f/1.8 from centre to corner. Smooth bokeh at the background. Quiet and (most of the time) accurate autofocus. Not that expensive.
Summary: An excellent lens for portrait and it works well on my Sony α7R3.
Overall
Owner since: 2 years
Price:
User profile: Amateur
Cons: None, except the 135 doesn\'t take Sigma TCs. Stabilization would be welcome when used on cropped sensor cameras.
Pros: Lovely. Works with all my cameras!
Summary: I got this a couple of months before pensioning, and I must say this lens is a stunner. Bokeh, sharpness, manual focus (should you feel the need) just so sweet, in every way. I use mine mostly as a portrait lens on my DX and FX, and as a short telephoto lens on my Nikon 1 cameras (crop factor 2.7). Totally delightful lens and I don\'t find that it renders a bit cool, like the other reviewer.
Overall
Owner since: 6 months
Price: 1100
User profile: Professional
Cons: None to be fair
Pros: Best lens I ever had
Summary: Free of LoCA\'s, superb resolution, excelent contrast, good AF
Overall
Owner since: 1 month
Price: €120
User profile: Amateur
Cons: A quite big and heavy lens. No image stabilization. Rather \"cool\" colors - one has to like this.
Pros: Very sharp. Stunning image Quality right from f1.8 away. Minimum focus distance of only 0.8m. Fast and (a new Sigma experience) reliable AF on my Nikon D810. Very pleasant, smooth and neutral out of focus areas.
Summary: Without a doubt an excellent lens, but nearly all modern portrait lenses in the 85-135mm range are sharp nowadays. So you should better check out whether you like the way it renders. A 135mm needs space if you want to do more than headshots and at least a 1/250s, so this one should better be your second or third portrait lens (after a 85 and a 70-200 or so). The Zeiss 135 has the best colors of the bunch (but is manual and expensive), the Samyang 135 is nearly as sharp and cheaper (but manual as well and has the poorer build). The new Nikon 105 f1.4 has maybe the best \"look\" (but is a bit too expensive).