LensTip.com

Lenses

There are 1686 lenses in our database and 3176 owners opinions.

You can also
compare lenses side-by-side

Search by:

Konica Minolta AF 35-105 mm f/3.5-4.5 N

Pictures:
Specifications:
Manufacturer Konica Minolta
Model AF 35-105 mm f/3.5-4.5 N
Lens style Universal zoom
Focal length 35 - 105 mm
Maximum aperture f/3.5 - 4.5
Angle of view 63 - 23 o
Closest focusing distance 0.85 m
Maximum magnification 1:6.5
Minimum aperture 27
Number of diaphragm blades 7
Auto focus type AF
Lens Construction 12 elements / 10 groups
Filter diameter 55 mm
Macro No
Available mounts Sony A / Minolta
Dimensions 68.5 x 59.5 mm
Weight 290 g
Additional information
Average rating (2 owners reviews)
Build quality
Optical quality
Value for money

Overall

2.83 Passing
Owners reviews (2)
  1. mjfab
    mjfab 21 July 2013, 06:07
    Build quality
    Optical quality
    Value for money

    Overall

    IP 49.144.x.x
    Owner since: 3 months
    Price: $15
    User profile: Amateur

    Cons: very soft at F/3.5. (compensate by maxing out in-cam sharpness by +2) full-on manual, on MFT, (if you're patient, it won't be an issue.) poor performance in low-light and indoors. (outdoors, different story)

    Pros: at 2X crop factor of a MFT camera, this becomes a stabilized telephoto lens (70-210mm range) not in your face range! think street photography/ in your face! think portrait w/ buttery bokeh. weights in plus adapter at 14 oz./400 grams. a tad lighter than oly pen's heaviest lens.

    Summary: don't buy over $30 for it. i use it w/ my olympus pen and actually happy w/ it (not as much as the 50mm f1.7)

  2. HenryTan
    HenryTan 30 November 2012, 03:23
    Build quality
    Optical quality
    Value for money

    Overall

    IP 60.48.x.x
    Owner since: 3 months
    Price: MYR300
    User profile: Semipro

    Cons: Not as sharp as its earlier version. 35mm is narrow...u know.

    Pros: Compact size, light weight and acceptable overall build quality.

    Summary: I'm not sure it's either my luck to got this 'degrade' copy or was it the lens is already like this since it is produced. Optically is not sharp. I need to stop down at least F7.1 to F11 to get myself "sharper" image. Else all will be "soft". It is not really soft or what but, just, not sharp alright. I suggest, skip this one and go for the one with "Macro", u'll be astonished by its performance!

Add your opinion

Build quality 0 1 2 3 4 5
Optical quality 0 1 2 3 4 5
Value for money 0 1 2 3 4 5