----- advertisement -----
Recommended


Support LensTip.com

Donations are welcome.

----- advertisement -----

Lens review

2010-05-21
 

Canon EF 24 mm f/1.4L II USM

8. Vignetting

When we attach the Canon 24L to the EOS 50D nothing warns us about the first serious slip-up of the tested lens. The combination of 24 mm focal length and f/1.4 aperture is very difficult to rein the vignetting in – on the small APS-C sensor we still don’t see any important reasons to complain as the brightness loss in the frame corners reaches 34% (-1.2 EV) there. Such a value is significant but rather expected, taking into account the difficulty level of such a combination. The situation improves very quickly on stopping down the aperture. By f/2.0 the light fall-off in the frame corners is 17% and by f/2.8 – just only 9%.

Canon EF 24 mm f/1.4L II USM - Vignetting


When we start testing the lens on the full frame there are some problems. Perhaps we put it too mildly after all -it’s enough to glance at the photos below to understand that we face serious issue.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - advertisement - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Canon EF 24 mm f/1.4L II USM - Vignetting


Fast lenses made us accustomed to the fact that on full frame their vignetting might reach even 3 EV. The Canon EF 24 mm f/1.4 USM II, though, breaks very disgraceful records here. At the maximum relative aperture its vignetting achieves a truly monstrous value of –4.4 EV which means that only 22% of light gets to the frame corners. If you try to light such a photo up it will hurt – there will be too much noise. For instance a picture taken with the ISO speed set at 200 will have the noise worse than at ISO 3200 after getting rid of such vignetting. Some people will keep the vignetting and praise the tested lens for its outstanding artistic vividness – well, there is no accounting for tastes.

On stopping down we see the vignetting decreasing but we can’t eliminate it completely. By f/2.0 the brightness loss in the frame corners amounts to 62%, by f/2.8 it reaches 43% and by f/4.0 it is still at a bothersome level of 37%. On further stopping down we see just slight decrease. By f/5.6 the vignetting is 31%, by f/8.0 it amounts to 26% and by f/11 it decreases by next 3%.

One important thing should be emphasized in this chapter. Many people underestimate the vignetting. They say it is easy to remove and often it gives a sought-after effect to a photo. While it is quite easy to add a vignetting effect to any picture without deteriorating its quality, if you want to remove it, it’s a different story. We already mentioned a significant increase of grain/noise when you try to light up a photo. The second side effect, connected very tightly with vignetting because it is, so to speak, its direct cause, is the light fall-off in the frame corners. It means a reduction of an effective gathering light area, and, after all, the resolution of an optical system depends on it. The vignetting entails the loss of resolution; it is one of the reasons why the tested lens has low resolution in full frame corners by f/1.4 and f/2.0. Perhaps it is unnecessary to add that once you lose some resolution it cannot be retrieved using any graphics software.


Canon EF 24 mm f/1.4L II USM - Vignetting

----- advertisement -----

Chapters