----- advertisement -----
Recommended

----- advertisement -----

Lenses

There are 1020 lenses in our database and 1333 owners opinions.

Search by:
Show only lenses reviewed by Lenstip.com

You can also
compare lenses side-by-side

 

Canon EF 50 mm f/1.2L USM

Canon EF 50 mm f/1.2L USMCanon EF 50 mm f/1.2L USMCanon EF 50 mm f/1.2L USM
 

Specifications:

Manufacturer Canon
Model EF 50 mm f/1.2L USM
Lens style Normal
Focal length 50 mm
Maximum aperture f/1.2
Angle of view 46.8 o
Closest focusing distance 0.45 m
Maximum magnification 1:6.67
Minimum aperture 16
Number of diaphragm blades 8
Auto focus type Ring USM
Lens Construction 8 elements / 6 groups
Filter diameter 72 mm
Macro No
Available mounts Canon EF
Dimensions 85.5 x 65.5 mm
Weight 580 g
Additional information Super Spectra coatings

Average rating (2 owners reviews).

Build quality 5.00
Optical quality 5.00
Value for money 5.00
Overall 5.00
Build quality
Optical quality
Value for money
Overall
User: keithinmelbourne
IP 211.30.x.x
Date: 2011-10-12 08:06:44
Owner since: 1 year
Price: $1800 AUD
User profile: Semipro
 

Cons: None

Pros: Sharpness, colour and contrast, bokeh, Build, AF accuracy and speed, results

Summary: Since I purchased it, the 50L has become my 'go to' lens. It's always on one of my camera bodies. I was surprised at the responsiveness and accuracy of the AF, having read so many negative reviews. The 50L is a big leap up from my 50 f1.4, which I keep but use much less. The results from the 50L are exceptional, especially if you're shooting into the sun. This is my favourite Canon lens.

Build quality
Optical quality
Value for money
Overall
User: Critical
IP 83.226.x.x
Date: 2011-04-15 23:56:25
Owner since: 6 months
Price: $1600
User profile: Amateur
 

Cons: Indescrete. Sigma 50mm f/1.4 EX DG is almost as good.

Pros: Very sharp. Colours.

Summary: It's funny how the reviews for EF 35mm f/1.4L and EF50mm f/1.2L differ. The MTF50 charts for the image resolution shows 50L is as sharp in the edges and much sharper than 35L in the centre, but in 35L review it gets praised for it's sharpness while in 50L review, the image quality is weak.


Build quality 0 1 2 3 4 5
Optical quality 0 1 2 3 4 5
Value for money 0 1 2 3 4 5