----- advertisement -----
Recommended

----- advertisement -----

Lenses

There are 1020 lenses in our database and 1341 owners opinions.

Search by:
Show only lenses reviewed by Lenstip.com

You can also
compare lenses side-by-side

 

Sigma 18-50 mm f/2.8-4.5 DC OS HSM

Sigma 18-50 mm f/2.8-4.5 DC OS HSMSigma 18-50 mm f/2.8-4.5 DC OS HSMSigma 18-50 mm f/2.8-4.5 DC OS HSM
 

Specifications:

Manufacturer Sigma
Model 18-50 mm f/2.8-4.5 DC OS HSM
Lens style Universal zoom
Focal length 18 - 50 mm
Maximum aperture f/2.8 - 4.5
Angle of view 69.3 - 27.9 o
Closest focusing distance 0.3 m
Maximum magnification 1:4.1
Minimum aperture 22
Number of diaphragm blades 7
Auto focus type HSM
Lens Construction 16 elements / 12 groups
Filter diameter 67 mm
Macro No
Available mounts Canon EF
Nikon F
Sony A / Minolta
Sigma
Pentax K
Dimensions 74 x 88.6 mm
Weight 395 g
Additional information

Average rating (8 owners reviews).

Build quality 4.75
Optical quality 3.63
Value for money 4.75
Overall 4.38
Build quality
Optical quality
Value for money
Overall
User: phototaxi
IP 89.204.x.x
Date: 2011-05-03 10:19:30
Owner since: 1 year
Price: 200€
User profile: Professional
 

Cons: a lot of optical disadvantages, if you use this lens outdoor at 18 or 50mm wide open, ok from 24 too 35mm

Pros: but my standard studio lens between 24 and 35mm at f8 too f11, best handling, no extension, stabilisized and fast and excact AF

Summary: best value if you look for a studio lens between 24 and 35 for aps-c (except productfotos)

Build quality
Optical quality
Value for money
Overall
User: ra96099
IP 212.198.x.x
Date: 2011-02-15 18:42:44
Owner since: 1 year
Price: 190EUR
User profile: Semipro
 

Cons: Corner sharpness, variable aperture

Pros: Stabilizer, F 2.8..

Summary: Excellent center sharpness, absolute best stabilized lens for the money!

Build quality
Optical quality
Value for money
Overall
User: mrggregg
IP 74.111.x.x
Date: 2011-02-13 05:04:44
Owner since: 6 months
Price: $200
User profile: Semipro
 

Cons: A bit soft at 18mm@2.8, but can sharpen up in Photoshop

Pros: Hard to beat for the money, I use on both my 20D and T2i, am very satisfied

Summary: Great buy

Build quality
Optical quality
Value for money
Overall
User: Paul
IP 62.203.x.x
Date: 2010-12-24 12:57:57
Owner since: 1 year
Price: CHF 275
User profile: Amateur
 

Cons: Prone to flaring with pictures into the sun or with night pictures with bright lights

Pros: Excellent build quality Accurate ultrasound autofocus Reasonable stabilisation Landscape shots f2.8 at 17mm

Summary: 1700 pictures taken. Great for landscapes. Given the price a very good lens

Build quality
Optical quality
Value for money
Overall
User: zhjlin
IP 67.181.x.x
Date: 2010-11-04 00:18:10
Owner since: 1 year
Price: $200
User profile: Amateur
 

Cons: color fringing at 18mm-21mm, corner softness at wider focal range, 18mm @ f2.8 isn't sharp enough, only 50mm zoom end, focus ring feels loose, slight vignetting,

Pros: fast, quiet HSM, accurate AF, smooth damped zoom ring, self contain zooming, no extension, great build quality with solid feel, comes with a nice lens hood, great pictures at all focal range @ f4 to F11, no flaring issues,

Summary: a very good upgrade from the kit 18-55mm kit lens. useful f2.8 for low light situation, and only f4.5 at tele end, great solid construction, very accurate fast AF HSM. great buy and good optics for $200

Build quality
Optical quality
Value for money
Overall
User: ojikame2
IP 61.114.x.x
Date: 2009-10-16 19:37:34
Owner since: 1 month
Price:
User profile: Amateur
 

Cons:

Pros:

Summary: sorry, very small dist.

Build quality
Optical quality
Value for money
Overall
User: ojikame
IP 61.114.x.x
Date: 2009-10-16 19:29:27
Owner since: 1 month
Price: 190 us dol
User profile: Amateur
 

Cons: very small dist. inner zoom at this price band.

Pros: its value lens per cost.

Summary: at ex-wide, very short compare with camera maker.

Build quality
Optical quality
Value for money
Overall
User: calli22
IP 86.73.x.x
Date: 2009-09-22 04:33:57
Owner since: 1 month
Price: 330eur
User profile: Amateur
 

Cons: image quality

Pros: Price, stabilisation, aperture

Summary: image quality are very poor compare to the sigma 50-150 f2,8


Build quality 0 1 2 3 4 5
Optical quality 0 1 2 3 4 5
Value for money 0 1 2 3 4 5