Lenses
There are 1105 lenses in our database and 1925 owners opinions.
You can also
compare lenses side-by-side
Specifications:
| Manufacturer | Panasonic |
|---|---|
| Model | G 14 mm f/2.5 ASPH. |
| Lens style | Wide angle |
| Focal length | 14 mm |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.5 |
| Angle of view | 75 o |
| Closest focusing distance | 0.18 m |
| Maximum magnification | 10 |
| Minimum aperture | 22 |
| Number of diaphragm blades | 7 |
| Auto focus type | AF |
| Lens Construction | 6 elements / 5 groups |
| Filter diameter | 46 mm |
| Macro | No |
| Available mounts | Micro Four Thirds |
| Dimensions | 46 x 20.5 mm |
| Weight | 55 g |
| Additional information |
Average rating (3 owners reviews).
| Build quality | 4.00 |   |
|---|---|---|
| Optical quality | 4.00 | |
| Value for money | 5.00 | |
| Overall | 4.33 |  |
| Build quality |  |
|---|---|
| Optical quality | |
| Value for money | |
| Overall | |
Owner since: 1 month
Price: 155 Euro
User profile: Amateur
Cons: - Small, small, small - Sharp center, even wide open - Fast focusing - Flare resistance - Mounts inexpensive 46mm filters, same as my Summilux25 - Inexpensive
Pros: - Weaker borders - Need to be stopped at least at f4
Summary: This lens gets mediocre ratings, if it wasn't for the weak borders it could deserve an excellent rating. Of course this is not the lens you would use for professional architecture photography where corner to corner sharpness is critical, but the center is noticeably sharper than the expensive Oly 17mm f1.8, if you can stop at f4 the borders are really decent. Build quality is fine, not outstanding, but the smallish barrel and the metal mount make an almost undestructable package.
| Build quality | |
|---|---|
| Optical quality | |
| Value for money | |
| Overall | |
Owner since: 3 months
Price: 200$
User profile: Semipro
Cons: much cheaper than 12/2.0, small
Pros: plastic
Summary: must have lens
| Build quality | |
|---|---|
| Optical quality | |
| Value for money | |
| Overall | |
Owner since: 3 months
Price:
User profile: Amateur
Cons: a
Pros: a
Summary: a
