LensTip.com

Lenses

There are 1643 lenses in our database and 3124 owners opinions.

You can also
compare lenses side-by-side

Search by:

Fujifilm Fujinon XF 16 mm f/2.8 R WR

Pictures:
Specifications:
Manufacturer Fujifilm
Model Fujinon XF 16 mm f/2.8 R WR
Lens style Wide angle
Focal length 16 mm
Maximum aperture f/2.8
Angle of view 83.2 o
Closest focusing distance 0.17 m
Maximum magnification 1:5.8
Minimum aperture 22
Number of diaphragm blades 9
Auto focus type AF / MF
Lens Construction 10 elements / 8 groups
Filter diameter 49 mm
Macro No
Available mounts Fujifilm X
Dimensions 45.4 x 60 mm
Weight 155 g
Additional information Announced: 14.02.2019
2 aspherical elements
Average rating (1 owners reviews)
Build quality
Optical quality
Value for money

Overall

4.67 Good
Owners reviews (1)
  1. Valdai21
    Valdai21 26 September 2019, 12:39
    Build quality
    Optical quality
    Value for money

    Overall

    IP 90.13.x.x
    Owner since: 3 months
    Price: 400
    User profile: Amateur

    Cons: - Significant field curvature - Only f/2,8

    Pros: - Small - Great build quality - Fast autofocus - Very good sharpness - Nice close focus abilities

    Summary: Next addition to the \"f/2 WR\" serie. This 16mm is only f/2,8 but since it\'s a wide angle, it\'s not critical. It\'s the smallest lens of the bunch and overall a good surprise. It focuses fast and has excellent sharpness in the center, very good and perfectly usable sharpness in the corners even if Samyang 12mm f/2 might be slightly better. It has good close focusing abilities even if the f/1,4 version is better in this regard. Like the 35mm f/2, it has significant field curvature but I found it well corrected and less annoying on a wide angle than with a standard lens. The 16mm f/2,8 is Fuji\'s cheapest prime along with the 27mm f/2,8 pancake. It\'s a nice little lens, very convenient for travel thanks to it\'s size and weather sealing. If you don\'t need f/1,4 and the absolute best image quality, then the 16mm f/2,8 does the job brillantly.

Add your opinion

Build quality 0 1 2 3 4 5
Optical quality 0 1 2 3 4 5
Value for money 0 1 2 3 4 5