Lens review

Leica D Summilux 25 mm f/1.4

5 June 2009
Arkadiusz Olech

4. Image resolution

The resolution tests were based on the RAW (ORF) files from the Olympus E-3 camera. These files were converted to the TIFF format without sharpening, using the dcraw programme. The results, in the form of the MTF50 function graph from the aperture, are presented in the picture below.

Leica D Summilux 25 mm f/1.4 - Image resolution

Before we get down to the facts, we should add that the Leica performance will be compared to two other lenses: a Canon 1.4/35, which on a 20D camera gives the same visual field, and an Olympus 3.5/35, which, for the Four Thirds system reflex camera owners, is a cheaper equivalent of a standard prime.

Please Support Us

The coronavirus crisis has been adversely affecting many businesses and, sad but true, ours is not an exception. Despite that difficult situation we would like to preserve continuity and high quality of publications available on all our websites. Still, we are now aware it might be impossible without additional financial help. That's why we would like to ask all those who visit, read, and care about Optyczne.pl, LensTip.com i Allbinos.com for support - it's enough you send us a small sum of money via PayPal. If a lot people decide to support our websites we think we'll stand a chance and survive next months without any lasting harm. We count on your support and understanding, stay safe and be healthy.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - advertisement - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

In the case of the Canon 1.4/35, the fully useful maximum relative aperture, at which the lens had the MTF results similar to f/16, was a very strong argument for buying it. The Leica fares even better, reaching the level of 40 lpmm at f/1.4, so exactly as at f/11. This is truly an impressing achievement because it translates into record results at the middle of the aperture range. At f/2.0 we get to the level of 48 lpmm so almost 10% better than with the brilliant Olympus 2.0/50. The maximum MTF50 values, reached by the Leica at f/4.0, are minimally better than 2.0/50 showed and by 6% better than the maximum of the Olympus 3.5/35. We know already that the hefty Leica’s price is paid for the outstanding picture quality in the frame center at all apertures.

We feel even more unsatisfied seeing the weak frame edge performance. In fact, the lens never reaches the level of 40 lpmm here, whereas the Olympus2.0/50 i 3.5/35 lenses exceeded it significantly for many aperture values. To sum up, the frame edge performance of the tested lens is only average and, as we deal with an expensive instrument and with the Four Thirds system, our lack of satisfaction is understandable. We were promised fabulous performance here.

At the end of the chapter, we traditionally show the crops from the centre of the test table, based on the JPEG files, using the standard camera set.

Leica D Summilux 25 mm f/1.4 - Image resolution