LensTip.com

Lens review

Sigma 10 mm f/2.8 EX DC FISHEYE HSM

10 December 2009
Arkadiusz Olech

4. Image resolution

The assessment of a „fisheye” lens in this category is a serious problem. Because of a wide angle of view and significant deformations in the frame edge we meet with many obstacles, unheard-of in previous tests. We don’t know how the black-to-white edge shape distortion, used by the Imatest program, influences the measured resolution. The picture scale change, which takes place because of these distortions, causes a visible distancing of the resolution areas from the field of vision center compared to the non-distortion lenses. What’s more, there are problems with the test charts and their lighting. Even when we use the biggest ISO chart available, the front element is still about 30 cm from its center. It is difficult to position the lighting in such a way so it doesn’t make the camera cast a shadow on the chart and exposes well the resolution areas in the same time.

Additionally, the proximity of the lens and the chart might be favorable for the tested instrument. The lens is so close that you can hardly expect any kind of distortion or even hot air movements. Short focal length additionally marginalizes any minimal vibrations of the body, which can’t be eliminated even using the best tripod stands, a cable release or an initial mirror lifting.

Let’s get down to facts. Similarly to the circular Sigma 2.8/4.5 we made the test on RAW files from the Canon 20D. Also in this case the frame center performance can be acclaimed as simply outstanding and right from the maximum relative aperture! There, the lens reaches a very high result of 37 lpmm; what’s more, by f/5.6 it breaks the Canon 20D record by achieving as much as 44.7 lpmm.


Please Support Us

The coronavirus crisis has been adversely affecting many businesses and, sad but true, ours is not an exception. Despite that difficult situation we would like to preserve continuity and high quality of publications available on all our websites. Still, we are now aware it might be impossible without additional financial help. That's why we would like to ask all those who visit, read, and care about Optyczne.pl, LensTip.com i Allbinos.com for support - it's enough you send us a small sum of money via PayPal. If a lot people decide to support our websites we think we'll stand a chance and survive next months without any lasting harm. We count on your support and understanding, stay safe and be healthy.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - advertisement - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Sigma  10 mm f/2.8 EX DC FISHEYE HSM - Image resolution

Like in the case of the Sigma 4.5 mm we have suspected that the results are a bit overstated. Apart from the resolution record, there’s also a very high value (32.7 lpmm) reached by f/16. For normal lenses with the focal lengths from more than a dozen to above 100 mm the MTF50 values by f/16 are a tad above 30 lpmm on the Canon 20D. In the case of the Sigma 10 mm the result is better by several percentage points. Even if we corrected that result downwards we wouldn’t change our overall frame center assessment – the performance here is brilliant.

Much worse situation can be observed in the frame edge. Once again, though, we must repeat the Sigma 4.5 mm test arguments. In the case of a “fisheye” the frame edge resolution areas move significantly from the center and are very distorted so the result is understated. You can assess the lens in the best way by having a look at the sample shots with some far away objects. The frames are nice, with most of the area sharp, which clearly proves that flat charts tests with the “fisheye” lenses are very difficult and the results don’t show the true frame edge performance.

At the end of the chapter we present the excerpts of our test chart for the frame center, saved in the JPEG format (standard sharpening).

Sigma  10 mm f/2.8 EX DC FISHEYE HSM - Image resolution