Tamron SP AF 17-50 mm f/2.8 XR Di II LD Aspherical (IF)
6. Distortion
How does this result look in comparison with the competition? When we compare it with really expensive models, like the Canon 17-55 mm f/2.8, the results are weak. The Canon’s distortion was –2.5%. If we compare the Tamron with something at the same price range, the Tamron looks much better. The Canon 17-85 mm IS USM has a much higher distortion of –5.7%, the Sigma 17-70 mm has -4.0% and the Nikkor 18-70 mm has -4.5%.
Please Support UsIf you enjoy our reviews and articles, and you want us to continue our work please, support our website by donating through PayPal. The funds are going to be used for paying our editorial team, renting servers, and equipping our testing studio; only that way we will be able to continue providing you interesting content for free. |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
When the focal length is increasing the problem of geometrical distortion starts to decrease. For 30 mm the distortion is almost invisible (0.24%) and at 50 mm is only 0.97%.