Sigma 10-20 mm f/3.5 EX DC HSM review - Vignetting

Have you rated your lenses yet?

Sigma 10-20 mm f/3.5 EX DC HSM

25 September 2009

Arkadiusz Olech

8. Vignetting

The slow Sigma 10-20 mm f/4.0-5.6 showed vignetting of just over 30%. Having slightly better brightness Nikkor 10-24 mm came out worse and showed light falloff in the corners of the frame of about 40%, no matter the focal length. Tamron 10-24 only at the shortest focal length reached 37% and for longer focal lengths showed vignetting of about 17-20%. The fast Tokina 11-16 mm came out quite well here, showing at the shortest focal length vignetting of about 36%, then decreasing to 20-27%.

Sigma 10-20 mm f/3.5 EX DC HSM - Vignetting

Unfortunately, Sigma 10-20 mm f/3.5 doesn’t come out so well here. At the most difficult variation of the widest angle and f/3.5 aperture, vignetting reaches a huge level of 53% (-2.16 EV). Bad news is not over yet, as vignetting falls quite slowly with stopping down. At apertures f/4.0, f/5.6 and f/8.0 it amounts to 43%, 29% and 25% respectively.

Increasing focal length helps, but not as much as we’d expect. At 15 mm and the maximum aperture, light falloff in the corners of the frame amounted to 42% (-1.59 EV). Here, decreasing of vignetting is even slower when stopping down, as at f/4.0 vignetting amounts to 39%, at f/5.6 still reaches a high level of 32%, and at f/8.0 we have a value of 25%.

Please Support Us

The coronavirus crisis has been adversely affecting many businesses and, sad but true, ours is not an exception. Despite that difficult situation we would like to preserve continuity and high quality of publications available on all our websites. Still, we are now aware it might be impossible without additional financial help. That's why we would like to ask all those who visit, read, and care about Optyczne.pl, LensTip.com i Allbinos.com for support - it's enough you send us a small sum of money via PayPal. If a lot people decide to support our websites we think we'll stand a chance and survive next months without any lasting harm. We count on your support and understanding, stay safe and be healthy.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - advertisement - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

The maximum focal length isn’t any better. At f/3.5 the level of this aberration was measured to be 43% (-1.61 EV), at f/4.0 it’s 40%, at f/5.6 it’s 35% and at f/8.0 - 26%.

We can see, then, that we’re dealing with one of the worst results in the ultra wide angle zoom lenses category. Vignetting will surely bother us in many situations, except maybe, when we’re fans of the mythical “magic” full frame camera bodies give. The thing is, to get this you also need a shallow depth of field, which this lens doesn’t provide you with.