Panasonic Leica DG Vario-Elmarit 8-18 mm f/2.8-4 ASPH.
5. Chromatic and spherical aberration
Chromatic aberration
The owners of the Panaleica 8-18 mm don’t have to worry about the longitudinal chromatic aberration. Its very slight influence can be noticed at the maximum relative aperture but even there it remains insignificant. On stopping down the aperture the situation improves significantly.![]() |

Please Support UsThe coronavirus crisis has been adversely affecting many businesses and, sad but true, ours is not an exception. Despite that difficult situation we would like to preserve continuity and high quality of publications available on all our websites. Still, we are now aware it might be impossible without additional financial help. That's why we would like to ask all those who visit, read, and care about Optyczne.pl, LensTip.com i Allbinos.com for support - it's enough you send us a small sum of money via PayPal. If a lot people decide to support our websites we think we'll stand a chance and survive next months without any lasting harm. We count on your support and understanding, stay safe and be healthy. |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
You have to admit the performance is very good indeed. The highest level of the aberration can be observed in an area close to the maximum relative aperture where, at all focal lengths, it keeps to a level of 0.06-0.07%. These are values we consider to be low. What’s more, on stopping down the aperture the aberration level decreases, reaching near 0.04%. As you see, no matter what focal length or aperture you apply, the lateral chromatic aberration shouldn’t bother you in real life photos. A round of applause!
E-M5 II, RAW, 13 mm, f/3.5 | E-M5 II, RAW, 18 mm, f/16.0 |
![]() |
![]() |
Spherical aberration
In first photos of this chapter you can clearly notice that the lens doesn’t have any ‘focus shift’ effect. Circles we got in front of and behind the focus weren’t perhaps completely identical but also they didn’t feature any noticeable differences. It all indicates lack of distinct spherical aberration correction problems.
Olympus E-M5 II, 18 mm, f/4.0, in front of | Olympus E-M5 II, 18 mm, f/4.0, behind |
![]() |
![]() |