There are 2161 lenses in our database and 3523 owners opinions.
You can also
compare lenses side-by-side
Search by:
Carl Zeiss Distagon T* 35 mm f/2 ZF/ZK/ZS/ZE
Pictures:
Specifications:
| Manufacturer | Carl Zeiss |
|---|---|
| Model | Distagon T* 35 mm f/2 ZF/ZK/ZS/ZE |
| Lens style | Wide angle |
| Focal length | 35 mm |
| Maximum aperture | f/2 |
| Angle of view | 63 o |
| Closest focusing distance | 0.3 m |
| Maximum magnification | |
| Minimum aperture | 22 |
| Number of diaphragm blades | 0 |
| Auto focus type | MF |
| Lens Construction | 9 elements / 7 groups |
| Filter diameter | 58 mm |
| Macro | No |
| Available mounts | Canon EF Nikon F M42 Pentax K |
| Dimensions | 97 x 64 mm |
| Weight | 530 g |
| Additional information |
Owners reviews (6)
Add your opinion
Overall
Owner since: 2 years
Price: 550 Euro ,
User profile: Semipro
Cons: Longitual CA at f2-f2.8
Pros: Sharpness from f2 , contrast, color, close focus, build quality
Summary: This was the first Zeiss that I bought as I was curious about that \"Zeiss 3D Pop\". Well it\'s there, I test this lens against Sigma Art 35mm f1.4 and Canon EF35 f2 IS and I find out that all of them are great lenses but I find the Zeiss to have more... natural sharpness, better transition from focus to out of focus and better behavior against bright light.
Overall
Owner since: 2 years
Price: 700 euros
User profile: Amateur
Cons: Lack of auto-focus for some might be a curse, for some a blessing.
Pros: Sublime rendition and very good subject isolation as well as being able to focus very close (no 1:1 macro lens here). Last but not least I have to mention that the \"Zeiss Pop\" is strong with this one.
Summary: The perfect lens for walk-around photography! It will reward good composition and patience with some of the best rendition available in a moderately light and small package that will not hinder the photographer in the process. One could learn a lot about photography with a manual focus lens such as this one. I will keep this copy until it or I break down.
Overall
Owner since: 3 years
Price:
User profile: Semipro
Cons: Vignetting (although it can be nice). Not as sharp, wide open, as some competitors (Samyang 35/.4 is better at f/2, for instance).
Pros: High constrast, very sharp when slightly stopped down, but at f/2 center is already quite sharp. Very low flare : this is my best lens for shooting against the light. Also very good at night (low coma). Reasonably priced if you can find a used copy. Excellent build and handling.
Summary: A lens able to deliver good, and even "punchy", images under most adverse circumstances.
Overall
Owner since: 3 months
Price: 550 euros
User profile: Semipro
Cons: Tested on a D610 Low sharpness in the corners and edges (esp left side). Near distance focusing difficult.
Pros: Sharp in the center. Very good contrast and colors.
Summary: Would not buy it again.
Overall
Owner since: 6 months
Price: 450 euro
User profile: Amateur
Cons: Longitual CA is quite pronounced @f/2-2.8
Pros: Perfect contrast and colours
Summary: Price made me doubt as a student but I'm happy with it.
Overall
Owner since: 3 months
Price: 500 euros
User profile: Professional
Cons: Have to learn how to manual focus again!
Pros: Image quality not seen since using Leica M glass.. Stunning
Summary: Glac ive ditched the Nikon glass. The difference in images shot on my D3 and D700 are very noticable. Yes its expensive but its well worth the investment and i cannot see these lenses depreciate much.. if at all