LensTip.com

Lenses

There are 1648 lenses in our database and 3134 owners opinions.

You can also
compare lenses side-by-side

Search by:

Olympus Zuiko Digital ED 14-35 mm f/2.0 SWD

Pictures:
Specifications:
Manufacturer Olympus
Model Zuiko Digital ED 14-35 mm f/2.0 SWD
Lens style Universal zoom
Focal length 14 - 35 mm
Maximum aperture f/2
Angle of view 75 - 34 o
Closest focusing distance 0.35 m
Maximum magnification 1:8.3
Minimum aperture 22
Number of diaphragm blades 9
Auto focus type SWD
Lens Construction 18 elements / 17 groups
Filter diameter 77 mm
Macro No
Available mounts Four Thirds
Dimensions 86 x 123 mm
Weight 915 g
Additional information Internal focusing, dust and splash proof
Average rating (7 owners reviews)
Build quality
Optical quality
Value for money

Overall

4.71 Good
Owners reviews (7)
  1. John_F
    John_F 22 August 2013, 23:27
    Build quality
    Optical quality
    Value for money

    Overall

    IP 88.97.x.x
    Owner since: 3 years
    Price: 1350 GBP
    User profile: Amateur

    Cons: Size and weight. Can be tiresome after a day.

    Pros: Lovely bokeh (de-focus). Pin sharp even wide open. Light gathering. Superb colour rendition with good contrast.

    Summary: You get what you pay for. One of the very best Zuiko Digital lenses.

  2. DL7BER
    DL7BER 5 November 2011, 15:02
    Build quality
    Optical quality
    Value for money

    Overall

    IP 123.115.x.x
    Owner since: 3 months
    Price: 15000 RMB
    User profile: Amateur

    Cons: For the price I am surprised having distortion (although small) in the whole zooming range. Precision of manual focus including noise characteristics could slightly be improved.

    Pros: Great contrast, natural colors, very sharp, good weight for long term usage and image stability on E-1 and E-3. Mechanical stabiltty (Shock and rain). Good handling, although focusing could be a bit quicker. Relatively good optical characteristics already at F=2.0.

    Summary: Great Lens which I now use in 90% of all pictures. My old 12...60 SWD gets more and more dust now....

  3. Vidar
    Vidar 11 June 2010, 10:20
    Build quality
    Optical quality
    Value for money

    Overall

    IP 84.208.x.x
    Owner since: 1 year
    Price: $1700
    User profile: Amateur

    Cons: Problematic/hunting AF Donīt work well with E-3 - had to buy E-30...

    Pros: Optical and Build quality

    Summary: My most used SHG lens Only 150/2 are better optically, and maybe 300/2.8 The result is stunning images

  4. Olytorr
    Olytorr 2 May 2010, 21:04
    Build quality
    Optical quality
    Value for money

    Overall

    IP 213.221.x.x
    Owner since: 6 months
    Price: 2100.00 CH
    User profile: Amateur

    Cons: Heavy

    Pros: F2, Bokeh, very very sharp!!!........

    Summary: Expensiv but exellent ;-))))

  5. Delphititan
    Delphititan 6 December 2009, 01:08
    Build quality
    Optical quality
    Value for money

    Overall

    IP 98.246.x.x
    Owner since: 6 months
    Price: $2200.00
    User profile: Semipro

    Cons: Heavy, large, expensive

    Pros: Stunning overall image quality, creamy bokeh, great zoom range for a "walk-around" lens

    Summary: Although expensive, still so amazing that the value can be justified for more serious users.

  6. SMK
    SMK 18 July 2009, 17:46
    Build quality
    Optical quality
    Value for money

    Overall

    IP 95.91.x.x
    Owner since: 2 years
    Price: 1700,00
    User profile: Semipro

    Cons: itīs a tall and bulky lens, but the same itīs my new standard-lens

    Pros: one of the best zuikoīs very nice bukeh very sharp lens

    Summary: itīs the money worth

  7. Jon S.
    Jon S. 6 June 2009, 09:02
    Build quality
    Optical quality
    Value for money

    Overall

    IP 68.149.x.x
    Owner since: 1 year
    Price: $2500
    User profile: Amateur

    Cons: Just the cost and weight. A F2 zoom is not small or cheap.

    Pros: Everything else.

    Summary: F2 and image stabalizing are a great combination.

Add your opinion

Build quality 0 1 2 3 4 5
Optical quality 0 1 2 3 4 5
Value for money 0 1 2 3 4 5