There are 2104 lenses in our database and 3495 owners opinions.

You can also
compare lenses side-by-side

Search by:

Sigma C 16 mm f/1.4 DC DN

Manufacturer Sigma
Model C 16 mm f/1.4 DC DN
Lens style Wide angle
Focal length 16 mm
Maximum aperture f/1.4
Angle of view 83.2 o
Closest focusing distance 0.25 m
Maximum magnification 1:9.9
Minimum aperture 16
Number of diaphragm blades 9
Auto focus type AF / MF
Lens Construction 16 elements / 13 groups
Filter diameter 67 mm
Macro No
Available mounts Micro Four Thirds
Sony E
Nikon Z
Fujifilm X
Canon EF-M
Dimensions 92.3 x 72.2 mm
Weight 405 g
Additional information Announced: 24.10.2017
2 aspherical elements, 2 special low dispersion elements, 3 "F" low dispersion elements
Average rating (2 owners reviews)
Build quality
Optical quality
Value for money


3.83 Average
Owners reviews (2)
  1. domeninini
    domeninini 2 July 2021, 17:50
    Build quality
    Optical quality
    Value for money


    IP 188.99.x.x
    Owner since: 6 months
    Price: 350
    User profile: Amateur

    Cons: no

    Pros: extremely sharp on my sony a6400 !

    Summary: great !

  2. Valdai21
    Valdai21 25 September 2019, 08:19
    Build quality
    Optical quality
    Value for money


    IP 90.13.x.x
    Owner since: 1 month
    Price: 300
    User profile: Amateur

    Cons: - Huge and heavy - Unreliable autofocus - Poor sharpness even stopped down to f/5,6 - Edges never become sharp - Strong copy to copy variations ?

    Pros: - Good build quality - Good bokeh

    Summary: I wonder if my sample had a problem because it was the worst lense I ever tested. Unfortunately I couldn\'t replace it because it was second hand so I just sent it back to the shop. Maybe another copy would be good but the one I got was not sharp at all. Even stopped down to f/4 or f/5,6 (sweet spot for a lot of micro 4/3 lenses), only the central area was ok. The lens might be better on APS-C since it was created for Sony cameras. I now got the 17mm f/1,2 and even if it was more expensive, it\'s night and day.

Add your opinion

Build quality 0 1 2 3 4 5
Optical quality 0 1 2 3 4 5
Value for money 0 1 2 3 4 5