----- advertisement -----
Recommended

----- advertisement -----

Articles

2009-12-01
 

A history of Sony Alpha - Minolta AF 50 mm f/1.7 versus Sony DT 50 mm f/1.8 SAM

8. Vignetting

In this category we should expect a victory of the full frame Minolta. On the other hand, though, the Sony is a bit less fast, has bigger dimensions and its rear element is as big as that of the Minolta so it is definitely not fighting a losing battle.

Minolta AF 50 mm f/1.7 – f/1.7 Sony DT 50 mm f/1.8 SAM – f/1.8
A history of Sony Alpha - Minolta AF 50 mm f/1.7 versus Sony DT 50 mm f/1.8 SAM - Vignetting A history of Sony Alpha - Minolta AF 50 mm f/1.7 versus Sony DT 50 mm f/1.8 SAM - Vignetting
Minolta AF 50 mm f/1.7 – f/2.0 Sony DT 50 mm f/1.8 SAM – f/2.0
A history of Sony Alpha - Minolta AF 50 mm f/1.7 versus Sony DT 50 mm f/1.8 SAM - Vignetting A history of Sony Alpha - Minolta AF 50 mm f/1.7 versus Sony DT 50 mm f/1.8 SAM - Vignetting
Minolta AF 50 mm f/1.7 – f/2.8 Sony DT 50 mm f/1.8 SAM – f/2.8
A history of Sony Alpha - Minolta AF 50 mm f/1.7 versus Sony DT 50 mm f/1.8 SAM - Vignetting A history of Sony Alpha - Minolta AF 50 mm f/1.7 versus Sony DT 50 mm f/1.8 SAM - Vignetting

The comparison of the results is to the Sony’s disadvantage, though. At the maximum relative aperture the Sony loses 38% of light in the corners whereas the Minolta – 33%. The difference is getting bigger by f/2.0. The Sony loses 35% of light, the Minolta – only 25%. Fortunately in both cases by f/2.8 the vignetting problem disappears. In the case of the Sony it amounts to 13%, in the case of the Minolta – to 11%.


A history of Sony Alpha - Minolta AF 50 mm f/1.7 versus Sony DT 50 mm f/1.8 SAM - Vignetting

----- advertisement -----

Chapters