Lenses
There are 1031 lenses in our database and 1495 owners opinions.
You can also
compare lenses side-by-side
Nikon Nikkor AF-S DX 55-300 mm f/4.5-5.6G ED VR
Specifications:
| Manufacturer | Nikon Nikkor |
|---|---|
| Model | AF-S DX 55-300 mm f/4.5-5.6G ED VR |
| Lens style | Telephoto zoom |
| Focal length | 55 - 300 mm |
| Maximum aperture | f/4.5 - 5.6 |
| Angle of view | 28.5 - 5.3 o |
| Closest focusing distance | 1.4 m |
| Maximum magnification | 1:3.6 |
| Minimum aperture | 29 |
| Number of diaphragm blades | 9 |
| Auto focus type | SWM |
| Lens Construction | 17 elements / 11 groups |
| Filter diameter | 58 mm |
| Macro | No |
| Available mounts | Nikon F |
| Dimensions | 76.5 x 123 mm |
| Weight | 530 g |
| Additional information | 2 ED, 1 HRI lens elements |
Average rating (4 owners reviews).
| Build quality | 3.50 |    |
|---|---|---|
| Optical quality | 4.25 | |
| Value for money | 4.75 | |
| Overall | 4.17 | |
| Build quality |  |
|---|---|
| Optical quality | |
| Value for money | |
| Overall | |
Owner since: 1 year
Price: MYR 1100.0
User profile: Amateur
Cons: Autofocus is slow and not suitable for shooting moving object. Lens hood design poor.
Pros: Decent build quality, sharp images and good contrast, relatively cheap and very useful focal range.
Summary: This lens is very good for travel and shooting far object. But slow autofocus limiting its ability to shoot moving object like animals, birds and sports. But this is a good lens for the price
| Build quality | |
|---|---|
| Optical quality | |
| Value for money | |
| Overall | |
Owner since: 1 year
Price: appr. 300
User profile: Semipro
Cons: no
Pros: light weight good opt. quality reasonable price
Summary: It was the right decesion to change from 70-300 VR to the new 55-300 , because I use it for APS-C Performance is better then with my 70-300
| Build quality | |
|---|---|
| Optical quality | |
| Value for money | |
| Overall | |
Owner since: 6 months
Price:
User profile: Amateur
Cons: Very slow focusing, cheap build quality, not fast lens, not conclusive VR (often better results with VR off).
Pros: Cheap relatively sharp lens, sharper than 55-200 VR and 70-300 VR, especially at 300mm, lightweight and small, perfect focal range.
Summary: Lightweight small cheap lens with perfect focal range and sharp output, but very slow focusing and not conclusive VR.
| Build quality | |
|---|---|
| Optical quality | |
| Value for money | |
| Overall | |
Owner since: 1 month
Price:
User profile: Amateur
Cons: Slow autofocus not good working vibration redction at 300mm low sharpness at 300mm
Pros: excelent sharpnes from 55 to 200mm low weigth
Summary: good lens for the money
