50 years of Nikon F-mount – Nikkor-S 5 cm f/2 vs. Nikkor AF 50 mm f/1.8D
11. Summary
The result is very interesting and it shows that the good build quality of a lens does matter and the plastics overuse in a barrel can have bad effects for the lens’s optics. The new Nikkor already has serious coma and astigmatism problems and those off-axis aberrations like “exploding” when the optic elements are misplaced. If we wanted to get a fair result , we should have used both lenses in the same condition for 40 years and then conducted such a test. I am pretty sure that the Nikkor AF 50 mm f/1.8 D would have serious troubles to defend the same draw.
While we are about it, I wouldn’t get cross at all if, at the present, the Nikon company launched on the market a small f/2.0 50mm lens with a “screwdriver” based autofocus system, a metal-only barrel but with modern optics and coatings. Actually, I would be one of the firsts in the queue to buy it.
Please Support UsIf you enjoy our reviews and articles, and you want us to continue our work please, support our website by donating through PayPal. The funds are going to be used for paying our editorial team, renting servers, and equipping our testing studio; only that way we will be able to continue providing you interesting content for free. |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sample shots taken with Nikkor-S 5 cm f/2.0: