Lens review

Sigma 18-125 mm f/3.8-5.6 DC OS HSM

4 September 2009
Arkadiusz Olech

3. Build quality and image stabilization

The first impression Sigma 18-125 mm OS makes is good. The lens gives the impression of being compact and sturdy at the same time, additionally its weight inspires confidence. When we compare it to the predecessor and to competitors, something we did in this table, we see that the weight is no illusion. Sigma is definitely the heaviest of this group of lenses, it also belongs to the biggest, although the dimensions of all the lenses are similar and there’s no disproportion like in the case of weight.

Sigma 18-125 mm f/3.8-5.6 DC OS HSM - Build quality and image stabilization

Sigma begins with a metal bayonet, standing out nicely against the plastic Nikkor 18-105 mm VR and 18-135 mm Nikkors. Right behind it, on the left side, we find a switch for focusing mechanism mode (AF/MF) and a switch for stabilization (OS On/Off). Even further there’s a big and convenient ring for changing focal length. It turns smoothly with an appropriate resistance, which remains the same in whole range. Nice for this price range lens. Above the zoom ring we find another ring, this time for manual focusing. It’s smaller, but allows convenient work. There’s a distance scale on it, expressed in feet and meters, which extends from 0.35 meter to infinity. At the very end we find the front system of lenses, which is surrounded with a non-rotating filter mount of 67 mm diameter, and which protrudes on a telescopic barrel making the dimensions of the lens increase to nearly 14 cm.

Please Support Us

The coronavirus crisis has been adversely affecting many businesses and, sad but true, ours is not an exception. Despite that difficult situation we would like to preserve continuity and high quality of publications available on all our websites. Still, we are now aware it might be impossible without additional financial help. That's why we would like to ask all those who visit, read, and care about Optyczne.pl, LensTip.com i Allbinos.com for support - it's enough you send us a small sum of money via PayPal. If a lot people decide to support our websites we think we'll stand a chance and survive next months without any lasting harm. We count on your support and understanding, stay safe and be healthy.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - advertisement - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Sigma 18-125 mm f/3.8-5.6 DC OS HSM - Build quality and image stabilization

Sigma 18-125 mm OS, having a wide range of focal lengths and image stabilization, is an optically complicated lens. It contains 16 lenses in 12 groups. The producer was generous with special elements like three aspherical lenses and one low-dispersion element of SLD glass. Inside the lens we also find a circular diaphragm with seven blades, which, depending on the focal length, can be closed down to f/22 or f/32.

Sigma 18-125 mm f/3.8-5.6 DC OS HSM - Build quality and image stabilization

A buyer gets both caps and a lens hood in the set. In standard, the lens has a 2-year warranty, but after paying extra charge you can extend it for another year.

Sigma 18-125 mm f/3.8-5.6 DC OS HSM - Build quality and image stabilization


The producer assures that the image stabilization works with 4 EV efficiency, so allows exposure times 16 times longer than those we can get using a lens of the same focal length without image stabilization.

Let’s look at the graph below to see how the producer’s assurances correspond with the facts. The graph presents percentage of unsuccessful images for 125 mm focal length, depending on the exposure time expressed in EV (0 EV corresponds to 1/200 second).

Sigma 18-125 mm f/3.8-5.6 DC OS HSM - Build quality and image stabilization

The average distance between the curves tells us about the efficiency of stabilization. We can see that it’s not bad, as the curves are separated by around 2.5 EV, and with longer times even 3 EV. It’s a typical result for this price range, but still lower than what the producer pledges.

What’s interesting, contrary to what you can read in some readers opinions, the stabilization worked noiselessly in our lens.