LensTip.com

Lens review

Olympus Zuiko Digital 14-54 mm f/2.8-3.5

3 March 2010
Arkadiusz Olech

7. Coma and astigmatism



Please Support Us

The coronavirus crisis has been adversely affecting many businesses and, sad but true, ours is not an exception. Despite that difficult situation we would like to preserve continuity and high quality of publications available on all our websites. Still, we are now aware it might be impossible without additional financial help. That's why we would like to ask all those who visit, read, and care about Optyczne.pl, LensTip.com i Allbinos.com for support - it's enough you send us a small sum of money via PayPal. If a lot people decide to support our websites we think we'll stand a chance and survive next months without any lasting harm. We count on your support and understanding, stay safe and be healthy.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - advertisement - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Coma is not a serious problem for the tested lens as you can see in the picture below. The deformations of the circular diode image in the frame corner are visible at every focal length but they are small – noticeably smaller than in the case of the ZD 14-42 mm and the Leica. Actually the ZD 12-60 mm had them at the same or a minimally lower level.

Olympus Zuiko Digital 14-54 mm f/2.8-3.5 - Coma and astigmatism

We have no serious reservation about astigmatism either, which value we measured as 4.1%. Here the ZD 14-54 mm performs minimally better than the “kit” lens, a tad worse than the Leica and practically similarly than the ZD 12-60 mm. In actual facts, though, the whole astigmatism values range of these lenses, from 3.7% to 5.0%, is contained within the margin of errors, reaching about 1% in this case.