Carl Zeiss Distagon T* 35 mm f/1.4 ZE/ZF.2
7. Coma, astigmatism and bokeh
When it comes to astigmatism we don’t have to think about it at all – the average difference between vertical and horizontal MTF50 function values in the case of the tested Zeiss amounts to 6% which is a low value.
Please Support UsIf you enjoy our reviews and articles, and you want us to continue our work please, support our website by donating through PayPal. The funds are going to be used for paying our editorial team, renting servers, and equipping our testing studio; only that way we will be able to continue providing you interesting content for free. |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Encouraged by the „Bokeh measurement” article, published by us not so long ago on Optyczne.pl (available in Polish only), and the discussion in the comments section we decided to enlarge our tests by the photos showing out of focus diode image, taken in the range of 4 EV up from the maximum relative aperture, both in the frame centre and on its edge.
As it was mentioned in that article, we don’t assume that this simple operation will allow to assess the bokeh of a lens in an unambiguous and comprehensive way. We still think that the way bokeh looks doesn’t depend fully on a lens itself but also on the kind of photographed scenery, the layout of objects and light. We also don’t intend to assess whether or not the photos of the out of focus diode look well or bad – it is really a matter of personal preferences.
However, photos like those above will be published anyway so everybody can see on their own how the light layout in the fuzzy diode image looks, how it is distorted, how the aperture diaphragm blades look and how big their number is and, finally, how intensive vignetting is and what is its source.