Lens review

Sigma 12-24 mm f/4.5-5.6 II DG HSM

27 December 2011
Arkadiusz Olech

4. Image resolution

The resolution test of the Sigma 12-24 mm f/4.5-5.6 II DG HSM was based on RAW files from the full frame Nikon D3x. The measurement errors ranged from 0.2 to 1.0 lpmm. It is worth reminding here that the decency level in the case of tests conducted on the D3x is situated on the level of 30-31 lpmm and the best fixed focal lenses can get as high as 46-47 lpmm. It should be also mentioned that the decency level, adopted by us is conventional only. We determined it assuming that the level reached near f/16 aperture would be a good quality indicator. When we stop down the aperture the diffraction degrades the image so much that it seems fuzzy. However, you must remember that everyone has his or her own demands concerning the usefulness of an image. For some people these 30-31 lpmm will be perfectly acceptable and for others it will be definitely too little.

If you expect here sensational and record-breaking results, be warned – there will be none of this. It is obvious without even testing the lens. Resolution records usually occur by f/4.0-5.6 and only for such lenses where these values are away from their maximum relative aperture by about 2-3 EV. Such a reserve is needed to stop the aperture down a bit, limiting the influence of optical aberrations efficiently, which are present in every optical instrument to a higher or lesser degree. In the case of the Sigma 12-24 mm the f/4.5-5.6 apertures are nothing less than the maximum relative aperture. It would be difficult to get any records here because the aforementioned aberrations are still present. When we start to stop the Sigma down the apertures enter the values of f/8-11 where the influence of diffraction, limiting MTF values, makes itself felt.

Let’s finish the theorizing now and check how the tested lens fared in the frame centre at 12,18 and 24 mm.

Please Support Us

If you enjoy our reviews and articles, and you want us to continue our work please, support our website by donating through PayPal. The funds are going to be used for paying our editorial team, renting servers, and equipping our testing studio; only that way we will be able to continue providing you interesting content for free.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - advertisement - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Sigma 12-24 mm f/4.5-5.6 II DG HSM - Image resolution

This graph is nothing the Sigma should be ashamed of, mainly because, at the maximum relative aperture, contrary to the performance of its predecessor, the lens reaches the decency level at every focal length. We hoped that the new lens would have better results after a slight stopping down though and here we were disappointed. The previous model was tested on the Canon 20D and that camera provides MTF values almost the same as those from the D3x, to an accuracy of 1-2 lpmm, so they are easily comparable. It is clearly seen that the current model and its predecessor reach a similar maximum level. Something which was satisfactory ten years ago might be not sufficient anymore.

Of course you still should maintain the right frame of reference. The image the Sigma provides in the frame centre is good – but nothing else. Our slight disappointment stems from the fact that we counted on the possibility that the Sigma 12-24 mm II might come closer to the level of 40 lpmm. Of course we didn’t expect it to exceed it for reasons described at the beginning of this chapter.

The previous model performed weakly already on the edge of the APS-C/DX sensor where it had problems with exceeding distinctly the level of 30 lpmm. How its successor fares here? Let’s look at a graph below.

Sigma 12-24 mm f/4.5-5.6 II DG HSM - Image resolution

After taking into consideration the measurement errors we can state boldly that the performance of the new lens is almost the same as that of the old lens. It’s a pity there is no improvement but, defending the tested Sigma, you should also notice that at all focal lengths the results are even and very close to the decency level.

It wouldn’t be hard to guess that the edge of full frame sensor is the most problematic here. It is unavoidable with such a wide angle. Let’s look at a graph below.

Sigma 12-24 mm f/4.5-5.6 II DG HSM - Image resolution

The official decency level is reached nowhere, even after stopping down. Taking into account the price of the Sigma 12-24 mm II there are too many average or weak results here. Below we present some crops of our test chart photos taken from JPEG files in the frame centre.

Sigma 12-24 mm f/4.5-5.6 II DG HSM - Image resolution