Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-100 mm f/4 IS PRO
7. Coma, astigmatism and bokeh
E-M5 II, 12 mm, f/4.0, center | E-M5 II, 12 mm, f/4.0, corner |
E-M5 II, 25 mm, f/4.0, center | E-M5 II, 25 mm, f/4.0, corner |
E-M5 II, 60 mm, f/4.0, center | E-M5 II, 60 mm, f/4.0, corner |
E-M5 II, 100 mm, f/4.0, center | E-M5 II, 100 mm, f/4.0, corner |
The astigmatism, understood as an average difference between vertical and horizontal MTF50 function values, amounted to 3.8% so was slight.
Please Support UsIf you enjoy our reviews and articles, and you want us to continue our work please, support our website by donating through PayPal. The funds are going to be used for paying our editorial team, renting servers, and equipping our testing studio; only that way we will be able to continue providing you interesting content for free. |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Taking into account the fact that you deal here with a zoom lens you cannot have serious reservations about its out-of-focus areas. Only a lighter rim and traces of concentric ‘onion’ rings might stick out a bit. You should also emphasize low influence of mechanical vignetting.
E-M5 II, 50 mm, f/4.0, center | E-M5 II, 50 mm, f/4.0, corner |
E-M5 II, 50 mm, f/5.6, center | E-M5 II, 50 mm, f/5.6, corner |
E-M5 II, 50 mm, f/8.0, center | E-M5 II, 50 mm, f/8.0, corner |
E-M5 II, 100 mm, f/4.0, center | E-M5 II, 100 mm, f/4.0, corner |
E-M5 II, 100 mm, f/5.6, center | E-M5 II, 100 mm, f/5.6, corner |
E-M5 II, 100 mm, f/8.0, center | E-M5 II, 100 mm, f/8.0, corner |