There are 2097 lenses in our database and 3493 owners opinions.
You can also
compare lenses side-by-side
Search by:
Tamron 28-300 mm F/3.5-6.3 Di VC PZD (Model A010)
Pictures:
Specifications:
| Manufacturer | Tamron |
|---|---|
| Model | 28-300 mm F/3.5-6.3 Di VC PZD (Model A010) |
| Lens style | Universal zoom |
| Focal length | 28 - 300 mm |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5 - 6.3 |
| Angle of view | 75.23 - 8.15 o |
| Closest focusing distance | 0.49 m |
| Maximum magnification | 1:3.5 |
| Minimum aperture | 22 |
| Number of diaphragm blades | 7 |
| Auto focus type | PZD |
| Lens Construction | 19 elements / 15 groups |
| Filter diameter | 67 mm |
| Macro | No |
| Available mounts | Canon EF Nikon F Sony A / Minolta |
| Dimensions | 74.4 x 96 mm |
| Weight | 540 g |
| Additional information | Announced: 06.02.2014 4 elements of LD (Low Dispersion) glass 3 Molded-Glass Aspherical elements 1 Hybrid Aspherical element 1 XR (Extra Refractive Index) glass element 1 element of UXR (Ultra-Extra Refractive Index) glass Sony mount model does not include VC |
Owners reviews (2)
Overall
Owner since: 2 years
Price: 100
User profile: Amateur
Cons: CAs, 300 mm not really sharp lens must be stopped down to f 13 in order to get better sharpness
Pros: big zoom range fast AF
Summary: a good lens for voyages and small magnifications - not on professional level
Overall
Owner since: 1 year
Price: 54000 JPY
User profile: Semipro
Cons: Poor stabilization performance; optical quality could be a little better at 300mm.
Pros: Extremely light and small package for a very handy zoom range. Sharp image at most settings. Fast focus. Close focus ability.
Summary: This lens replaced my 70-300 as my zoom lens and made a very convenient set with an ultra-wide-zoom and a 50/85mm prime. For most settings it is very sharp and handy on my 24MP body. The weakness is at 300mm, where it is not that sharp if you are a hair-splitter, even stopped down, and the slow aperture (f/6.3) and poor stabilization (estimated only 2-stop) often force me to use higher ISOs. Still I think this is THE travelling lens to go for a FF body. Compared to Canon and Nikon 28-300 lenses it is much smaller and lighter with comparable performance, and compared to 70-300 lenses it is lighter, with much closer focus and covers much more focal range.