There are 2105 lenses in our database and 3495 owners opinions.

You can also
compare lenses side-by-side

Search by:

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 14-150 mm f/4.0-5.6 ED II

Manufacturer Olympus
Model M.Zuiko Digital 14-150 mm f/4.0-5.6 ED II
Lens style Universal zoom
Focal length 14 - 150 mm
Maximum aperture f/4 - 5.6
Angle of view 75 - 8.2 o
Closest focusing distance 0.5 m
Maximum magnification 0.44
Minimum aperture 22
Number of diaphragm blades 7
Auto focus type AF / MF
Lens Construction 15 elements / 11 groups
Filter diameter 58 mm
Macro No
Available mounts Micro Four Thirds
Dimensions 63.5 x 83 mm
Weight 285 g
Additional information Premier: 5.02.2015
Average rating (2 owners reviews)
Build quality
Optical quality
Value for money


4.67 Good
Owners reviews (2)
  1. DjokoPras
    DjokoPras 10 May 2021, 23:45
    Build quality
    Optical quality
    Value for money


    IP 140.213.x.x
    Owner since: 2 years
    Price: At discoun
    User profile: Amateur

    Cons: I couldn\'t spot any at this discounted price

    Pros: Very compact for 28-300mm equivalent lens. Sharp enough for casual travel photography

    Summary: A great lens if you can get it at discount

  2. Jan Steinman
    Jan Steinman 14 September 2018, 07:30
    Build quality
    Optical quality
    Value for money


    IP 24.68.x.x
    Owner since: 1 year
    Price: 127 (broke
    User profile: Professional

    Cons: Low contrast, which is easily fixed in post-processing. A bit soft at the tele end.

    Pros: Incredible zoom range. Lightweight and small. Close focusing. Absolutely silent.

    Summary: I got this one broken for an excellent price, and sent it to Olympus repair for a very reasonable repair cost, still coming out ahead of used market price. I would not have bought it at market price. But now, I\'m glad I have it! It is a wonderful travel lens, being wide-range, lightweight and small. It is excellent for all but the most demanding situations. It is the one lens I take when I can only carry one lens. Good situations include family gatherings and any travel where photography is not the primary purpose. On the other hand, I don\'t use it for demanding studio work or paid portrait work. It\'s main failing is low contrast, but hitting the \"auto\" button on almost any photo software fixes that handily. Originally, I only bought it because it was such a deal. But I find it very useful, and would consider replacing it (if necessary) at market value. (I did buy the four-year extended warranty after the repair.)

Add your opinion

Build quality 0 1 2 3 4 5
Optical quality 0 1 2 3 4 5
Value for money 0 1 2 3 4 5