Tamron AF 18-270 mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II VC LD Asph. (IF) MACRO
6. Distortion
As you see in the chart below, fortunately the Tamron fares a bit better at longer focal lengths but still it lags behind the Sigma, which is an example to be followed in this category.
|
Tamron 18-270 VC |
Nikkor 18-200 VR |
Sigma 18-200 OS |
Sony 18-200 |
Tamron 18-200 |
18 mm |
-5.74%
|
-5.40% |
-4.4% |
-5.50%
|
-5.14%
|
50
mm |
1.49% |
1.59% |
1.20% |
2.00% |
1.78% |
100
mm |
1.34% |
1.46% |
1.00% |
1.55% |
1.40% |
200
mm |
1.03% |
1.21% |
1.00% |
1.33% |
1.17% |
270
mm |
0.94% |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Please Support UsIf you enjoy our reviews and articles, and you want us to continue our work please, support our website by donating through PayPal. The funds are going to be used for paying our editorial team, renting servers, and equipping our testing studio; only that way we will be able to continue providing you interesting content for free. |
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |