LensTip.com

Lens review

Sony E 18-55 mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

15 March 2011
Arkadiusz Olech

7. Coma and astigmatism



Please Support Us

The coronavirus crisis has been adversely affecting many businesses and, sad but true, ours is not an exception. Despite that difficult situation we would like to preserve continuity and high quality of publications available on all our websites. Still, we are now aware it might be impossible without additional financial help. That's why we would like to ask all those who visit, read, and care about Optyczne.pl, LensTip.com i Allbinos.com for support - it's enough you send us a small sum of money via PayPal. If a lot people decide to support our websites we think we'll stand a chance and survive next months without any lasting harm. We count on your support and understanding, stay safe and be healthy.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - advertisement - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

The coma is corrected equally well at all focal lengths and you can notice it only at the widest angle. Even at 18 mm and wide open its level is acceptable. The lens fares very well here and it gets a positive mark.

Sony E 18-55 mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS - Coma and astigmatism

The astigmatism mark is worse because the tested lens belongs to the NEX system with currently only one sensor available - that used in the NEX-3 and NEX-5 cameras. The test of the latter showed the difference between the horizontal and vertical resolution amounting to 15-20% for two lenses. It is difficult to say explicitly whether these two lenses really feature such a similar astigmatism level; perhaps (and it is a more probable assumption) it’s the sensor and the low-pass filter which cause such asymmetry. A more insightful astigmatism analysis at different combination of apertures and focal lengths only allows us to say that in the middle of the focal range the astigmatism of the tested kit cannot be passed over. At both ends of focal range the influence of astigmatism is certainly weaker and the differences in resolution are more due to the properties of the sensor.