LensTip.com

Lens review

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 25 mm f/1.2 PRO

10 January 2017
Arkadiusz Olech

11. Summary

Pros
  • solid, metal, weather-resistant casing,
  • very good image quality in the frame centre,
  • good image quality on the edge of the frame starting already from the maximum relative aperture,
  • moderate longitudinal chromatic aberration,
  • practically zero distortion,
  • noticeably lower vignetting than that of its rivals,
  • noticeably lower coma than that of its rivals,
  • silent, quick and accurate autofocus.

Cons:

  • weaker lateral chromatic aberration correction than that of rivals,
  • noticeable spherical aberration,
  • too high astigmatism,
  • problems with performance against bright light.

I think our test showed clearly that the Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 25 mm f/1.2 PRO is a lens which guarantees you even performance across the frame, not resolution records. It’s a feature its rivals failed to deliver. The Olympus provides fully acceptable image on the edge of the frame already from the maximum relative aperture. What’s more, it corrects coma, vignetting and distortion better than the competition.


Please Support Us

The coronavirus crisis has been adversely affecting many businesses and, sad but true, ours is not an exception. Despite that difficult situation we would like to preserve continuity and high quality of publications available on all our websites. Still, we are now aware it might be impossible without additional financial help. That's why we would like to ask all those who visit, read, and care about Optyczne.pl, LensTip.com i Allbinos.com for support - it's enough you send us a small sum of money via PayPal. If a lot people decide to support our websites we think we'll stand a chance and survive next months without any lasting harm. We count on your support and understanding, stay safe and be healthy.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - advertisement - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Still not everything is perfect. Taking into account the complex optical construction I counted on better astigmatism and chromatic aberration correction as well and the Olympus let me down. Its construction, with a high number of air-to-glass surfaces, was a liability when it came to the performance against bright light.

The pricing is another problem. With a price tag of about $1199 attached to it, the Olympus is $600 more expensive than the Pana-Leica 1.4/25 and about $400 more expensive than the Voigtlander 0.95/25. Still if Canon demands over $1300 for its fast standard lens, the EF 50 mm f/1.2 USM model, which is optically weak and very fuzzy near the maximum relative aperture, Olympus shouldn’t have any reservations either. It doesn’t change my conclusion that, with a lower price, the lens would gain a bigger market share.