LensTip.com

Lens review

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 25 mm f/1.2 PRO

10 January 2017
Arkadiusz Olech

8. Vignetting

Let’s glance at thumbnails below to assess the vignetting performance of the tested lens for JPEG files from the Olympus O-MD E-M5 Mark II.

Olympus E-M5 II, f/1.2 Olympus E-M5 II, f/1.4
Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 25 mm f/1.2 PRO - Vignetting Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 25 mm f/1.2 PRO - Vignetting
Olympus E-M5 II, f/2.0 Olympus E-M5 II, f/2.8
Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 25 mm f/1.2 PRO - Vignetting Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 25 mm f/1.2 PRO - Vignetting


At the maximum relative aperture the vignetting reaches 38% (-1.38 EV). It is a distinct level but, taking into account the fastness of the lens, still acceptable. The vignetting of the slower Panaleica 1.4/25 was definitely higher (49%). On stopping down the aperture to f/1.4 the vignetting decreases to 33% (-1.15 EV), becoming moderate by f/2.0 where it reaches just 19% (-0.62 EV). Problems practically end by f/2.8 and f/4.0 where we got the following results: 13% (-0.39 EV) and 8% (-0.25 EV) respectively.


Please Support Us

If you enjoy our reviews and articles, and you want us to continue our work please, support our website by donating through PayPal. The funds are going to be used for paying our editorial team, renting servers, and equipping our testing studio; only that way we will be able to continue providing you interesting content for free.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - advertisement - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

When it comes to RAW files the vignetting level was a bit higher due to a slightly bigger area they cover. Still the differences between them and JPEG files didn’t exceed 2% so were bordering margin of error.

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 25 mm f/1.2 PRO - Vignetting