LensTip.com

Lens review

Canon EF 70-200 mm f/4L IS II USM

6 November 2019
Arkadiusz Olech

11. Summary



Please Support Us

The coronavirus crisis has been adversely affecting many businesses and, sad but true, ours is not an exception. Despite that difficult situation we would like to preserve continuity and high quality of publications available on all our websites. Still, we are now aware it might be impossible without additional financial help. That's why we would like to ask all those who visit, read, and care about Optyczne.pl, LensTip.com i Allbinos.com for support - it's enough you send us a small sum of money via PayPal. If a lot people decide to support our websites we think we'll stand a chance and survive next months without any lasting harm. We count on your support and understanding, stay safe and be healthy.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - advertisement - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Pros:

  • solid and sealed barrel,
  • excellent image quality in frame centre,
  • very good image quality on the edge of APS-C sensor,
  • good image quality on the edge of full frame,
  • very good control of longitudinal chromatic aberration,
  • low lateral chromatic aberration,
  • slight distortion on APS-C detector,
  • lack of coma-related problems,
  • practically zero astigmatism,
  • negligible vignetting on APS-C sensor,
  • nice out-of-focus areas,
  • silent and accurate autofocus,
  • efficient optical stabilization,
  • very good cooperation with the TC 1.4x III teleconverter.

Cons:

  • slight spherical aberration,
  • performance against bright light could have been a bit better,
  • higher vignetting than that of direct rivals.

The Canon EF 70–200 mm f/4L IS II USM is undoubtedly an excellent lens. The list of its good points is impressive and the number of flaws- low. What's more, the cons list includes rather small slip-ups than serious disadvantages. Still the rivals aren't idle and, for instance, the  Tamron 70–210 mm f/4 Di VC USD, tested by us last year, can compete with the Canon on equal terms and it remains noticeably cheaper. Currently you have to pay about $1200 for the Canon, twice more than for the Tamron. On the other hand the older version of the stabilized Canon 70-200 mm f/4L costs $300 less than the new instrument so, in fact, it's really worth considering to buy the newer lens.

If you don't like compromises and you are a fan of brand-name lenses the Canon EF 70-200 mm f/4L IS II USM might be a good choice; I don't doubt you'll enjoy using it.