Nikon Nikkor Z 14-30 mm f/4 S review - Distortion

Have you rated your lenses yet?

Nikon Nikkor Z 14-30 mm f/4 S

1 February 2021

Maciej Latałło

6. Distortion

When you attach the tested lens to the Nikon Z7, like in the case of the Nikkor Z 24-70 mm f/4 S, it deactivates an option that switches off distortion correction. Such a procedure might suggest that optics constructors gave up on correction of that aberration, allowing the camera software to deal with it. Let's find out whether our guesses are right.

First, let's deal with the smaller APS-C/DX sensor. Everything looks perfectly well as long as you stick to JPEG files. The results we got at 14, 16, 20, 24, and 30 mm are, respectively: +0.18%, +0.19%, +0.06%, +0.03%, and +0.01%. All of them, within the margin of error, are practically zero so there are no problems whatsoever.

Nikon Z7, APS-C, JPEG, 14 mm

Nikon Z7, APS-C, JPEG, 16 mm

Nikon Z7, APS-C, JPEG, 20 mm

Nikon Z7, APS-C, JPEG, 24 mm

Nikon Z7, APS-C, JPEG, 30 mm

Please Support Us

The coronavirus crisis has been adversely affecting many businesses and, sad but true, ours is not an exception. Despite that difficult situation we would like to preserve continuity and high quality of publications available on all our websites. Still, we are now aware it might be impossible without additional financial help. That's why we would like to ask all those who visit, read, and care about Optyczne.pl, LensTip.com i Allbinos.com for support - it's enough you send us a small sum of money via PayPal. If a lot people decide to support our websites we think we'll stand a chance and survive next months without any lasting harm. We count on your support and understanding, stay safe and be healthy.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - advertisement - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Still, the real situation can be revealed only by RAW files developed with neutral software such as dcraw and it's nothing we would like. It isn't perhaps very bad per se but it also constitutes a very bad prognosis for the performance on full frame.

At 14 mm you deal with barrel variant which is relatively easy to spot as its value amounts to −2.84%. At 16 mm it decreases to −1.13% and a moment later it turns zero and then changes the sign. At 20 mm you deal with a low level of pincushion distortion of +0.63%. With further lengthening of the focal length that 'pincushion' increases - at 24 mm it is already +1.34%, and at 30 mm it reaches +1.60%.

Nikon Z7, APS-C, RAW, 14 mm

Nikon Z7, APS-C, RAW, 16 mm

Nikon Z7, APS-C, RAW, 20 mm

Nikon Z7, APS-C, RAW, 24 mm

Nikon Z7, APS-C, RAW, 30 mm

Now let's turn to the performance on full frame. JPEG files don't make us worry because, once again, you deal here with results very close to zero. At 14, 16, 20, 24, and 300 mm we got the following values: +0.22%, +0.23%, +0.01%, −0.01%, and −0.07% respectively.

Nikon Z7, FF, JPEG, 14 mm

Nikon Z7, FF, JPEG, 16 mm

Nikon Z7, FF, JPEG, 20 mm

Nikon Z7, FF, JPEG, 24 mm

Nikon Z7, FF, JPEG, 30 mm

Now is the moment of truth – let's check the RAW files performance on full frame. At 14 mm you see huge barrel distortion of −7.04%. At 16 mm it decreases noticeably but still it remains perfectly visible, reaching −3.61%. Further increase of focal length makes it drop very quickly; then it becomes zero and turns into pincushion variation of that aberration. At 20 mm you deal with a value of +1.22%, at 24 mm its level increases to +3.00%, and at 30 mm it is +3.72%.

Pincushion distortion of such a high level, perfectly visible with angles of view amounting to 70-80 degrees, it is a really interesting experience.