LensTip.com

Lens review

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 8-25 mm f/4 PRO

26 October 2021
Maciej Latałło

4. Image resolution

Our resolution test (resolution meaning MTF50 function values) of the Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 8-25 mm f/4.0 PRO was based on RAW files from the Olympus O-MD E-M5 Mark II. In that case the decency level is situated at 48-50 lpmm and the best fixed focal legth lenses can get as high as 85 lpmm or higher. So far, the best resolution levels were achieved by the Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 45 mm f/1.2 PRO, which was able to get to near 96 lpmm, and the Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 17 mm f/1.2 PRO, an official record holder on this sensor, which was able to reach 98.6 lpmm.

Let's check how the tested lens compares – its results in the frame centre at 8, 16, and 25 mm presents a graph below.

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 8-25 mm f/4 PRO - Image resolution


Please Support Us

The coronavirus crisis has been adversely affecting many businesses and, sad but true, ours is not an exception. Despite that difficult situation we would like to preserve continuity and high quality of publications available on all our websites. Still, we are now aware it might be impossible without additional financial help. That's why we would like to ask all those who visit, read, and care about Optyczne.pl, LensTip.com i Allbinos.com for support - it's enough you send us a small sum of money via PayPal. If a lot people decide to support our websites we think we'll stand a chance and survive next months without any lasting harm. We count on your support and understanding, stay safe and be healthy.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - advertisement - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


When I test the resolution of different Micro 4/3 system lenses as fast as f/4.0-5.6 I always wonder what kind of a challenge it is for the optics constructors. After all, with such aperture values, diffraction already comes into play and, for the same reasons, resolution records in that system along with the highest values, can be achieved near f/2.8.

As you can imagine the task of a lens with an f/4.0 maximum relative aperture is really difficult. There is no room for mistakes that could potentially decrease MTFs in a 1-2 EV range from the maximum relative aperture; on stopping down the lens simply won't be able to spread wings. In this case by f/8.0, so on stopping down the aperture by 2 EV in order to limit significantly the influence of optical aberrations, available MTFs reach 70 lpmm, being far lower than the record level of almost 100 lpmm we set at the beginning of this chapter.

As you see these 70 lpmm will be a good reference level. If the lens is able to exceed it, it means the constructors have handled their task pretty well. Taking it all into account the results of the Olympus 8-25 mm in the frame centre look really well. By f/5.6 all focal lengths distinctly exceed 70 lpmm and at the maximum relative aperture they also keep close to that value, with an exception of 8 mm which result is slightly lower. If you add to that a more or less even performance across the focal range the overall image is positive indeed.

Still, there is a fly in this otherwise excellent ointment. The Olympus 12-45 mm f/4.0, so a lens equally fast, up from the maximum relative aperture was able to exceed even 80 lpmm. It proves the performance of the tested lens is good but it could have been even better. Of course in case of the 8-25 mm model optics specialists had to correct a wider range of angles of view, always an obstacle that raises the bar significantly.

Now let's check the performance on the edge of the frame – a graph below presents the results of our test.

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 8-25 mm f/4 PRO - Image resolution


From f/5.6 onwards you observe a very even performance at all focal length; what's more, the lens keeps a very good resolution level, exceeding 60 lpmm. It's worth adding that the 8 mm focal length fares the best at the maximum relative aperture; it's obvious it's been taken care of in a special way. The Olympus 8-25 mm doesn't have any weak points in this area and its results are just slightly weaker than these of its 12-45 mm system brother.

To sum up: after the test of the Olympus 12-45 mm f/4.0 our expectations concerning the 8-25 mm device were very high so we feel somewhat unsatisfied. On the other hand the new lens doesn't have any weak points and is able to produce sharp images across the frame and across the whole focal range – no mean feat with such parameters and something the lens should be praised for. In other words the Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 8-25 mm f/4 PRO performs exactly as it should; I think it won't let its users down.

At the end of this chapter, traditionally, we presents crops of our resolution testing chart taken from photos saved as JPEG files along with RAW files we used for the analysis above.

Olympus E-M5 II, JPEG, 8 mm f/4.0
Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 8-25 mm f/4 PRO - Image resolution
Olympus E-M5 II, JPEG, 25 mm, f/5.6
Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 8-25 mm f/4 PRO - Image resolution