Lens review

Panasonic Leica DG Summilux 12 mm f/1.4 ASPH

11 July 2017
Arkadiusz Olech

11. Summary

Please Support Us

The coronavirus crisis has been adversely affecting many businesses and, sad but true, ours is not an exception. Despite that difficult situation we would like to preserve continuity and high quality of publications available on all our websites. Still, we are now aware it might be impossible without additional financial help. That's why we would like to ask all those who visit, read, and care about Optyczne.pl, LensTip.com i Allbinos.com for support - it's enough you send us a small sum of money via PayPal. If a lot people decide to support our websites we think we'll stand a chance and survive next months without any lasting harm. We count on your support and understanding, stay safe and be healthy.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - advertisement - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


  • Solid, metal casing,
  • Very good image quality in the frame centre,
  • Sensible image quality on the edge of the frame (meaning values averaged out),
  • Negligible lateral chromatic aberration,
  • Quick decrease of vignetting on stopping down the aperture,
  • Silent, quick, and efficient autofocus.


  • Distinct difference in sharpness between left and right sides of the frame,
  • Problems with longitudinal chromatic aberration,
  • Bothersome coma in the right part of the frame,
  • High distortion for RAW files,
  • Performance against bright light could have been better.
It would be difficult not to examine the results of the tested lens in the context of its price. Like almost everything with the word “Leica” in their name the lens is expensive – currently you have to pay for it as much as $1300. Compare that to the price tag of the Fujinon XF 16 mm f/1.4R WR, a lens which provides the same angle of view on the bigger APS-C sensor, which is less than $1000. For a similar amount of money you can buy the full frame Sigma A 24 mm f/1.4 DG HSM. Even the Canon EF 24 mm f/1.4L II USM is slightly cheaper than the Panaleica, tested here. Only Nikon demands more for their Nikkor AF-S 24 mm f/1.4G ED; with a price tag of $2000 it is the most expensive of all lenses, described in this test.

It’s worth emphasizing the fact that full frame 1.4/24 lenses are not only more difficult to design but also, unlike the Panasonic, their optics is responsible for distortion correction without any help from camera’s software. In that light even if the results of the Panasonic were outstanding in every category it still should be criticized for its exorbitant price.

Meanwhile the cons list, ending our test, is quite long. The slip-up concerning the uneven sharpness spread is another example, after our binoculars’ endurance test in which Leica products didn’t exactly distinguish themselves, that quality control problems can concern even the most renowned companies on the market. Still it’s possible that this time the scolding should go to Panasonic as I suppose that company is responsible for the quality control of products released under the joint name of Leica Panasonic.