LensTip.com

Lens review

Sigma 70-200 mm f/2.8 II EX APO DG Macro HSM

15 September 2009
Arkadiusz Olech

7. Coma and astigmatism



Please Support Us

The coronavirus crisis has been adversely affecting many businesses and, sad but true, ours is not an exception. Despite that difficult situation we would like to preserve continuity and high quality of publications available on all our websites. Still, we are now aware it might be impossible without additional financial help. That's why we would like to ask all those who visit, read, and care about Optyczne.pl, LensTip.com i Allbinos.com for support - it's enough you send us a small sum of money via PayPal. If a lot people decide to support our websites we think we'll stand a chance and survive next months without any lasting harm. We count on your support and understanding, stay safe and be healthy.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - advertisement - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

The cause of the lower performance at the edge of the frame, compared to Nikkor 80-200 mm f/2.8 and Sigma 70-200 mm f/2.8 in the I version we can find, among other things, in off-axial aberrations like coma and astigmatism. As you can see from the picture below, coma in Sigma 70-200 mm f/2.8 II doesn’t reach large dimensions, but its influence is visible. It looked better in the predecessor and Nikkor.

Sigma 70-200 mm f/2.8 II EX APO DG Macro HSM - Coma and astigmatism

The situation looks even more seriously when we look at astigmatism. This is a noticeable slip-up. Its average value equals 14.3%, which isn’t something to praise, all the more so because astigmatism increases with the focal length and at 70 mm is quite small (5%), to reach over 20% at longer focal lengths. As if that astigmatism is “sitting” in the lens itself, we shouldn’t be surprised by the fact that adding the converter intensifies this aberration noticeable and it reaches as much as 27% there… The slip-up is even more serious, considering the predecessor had slight astigmatism.